CP Group and Veolia team up for unique MRF in UK

Source: The CP Group
Jun. 27, 2012
0.511.522.533.544.55 (0 votes)

State-of-the-art facility includes High-tech equipment, Learning Center, & Green Construction

The CP Group, headquartered in San Diego, CA, designed, manufactured and installed the Material Recovery Facility for Veolia in Gillmoss, Liverpool, UK. The facility, which is capable of processing 85,00TPA, has been in operation since late 2011, and recently had its grand opening.

The large facility processes a mix of household recyclables including cardboard, paper, glass, steep cans, aluminum, mixed plastics and plastic bottles collected from the Knowsley, Liverpool and St. Helens households. The facility has capabilities to process up to 250 TPD.

The building is unique in that it has a combination of high tech sorting with the latest green construction techniques. The attractive curved roof allows natural light into the building, and recycled materials were used in the construction of the building and its foundation.

George Morrison, CP Group Project Manager said, “This is a truly unique recycling facility.  The Merseyside Recycling and Waste Authority have incorporated state of the art recycling technology, eye catching architecture and community education facilities into one attractive package.”

CPME did the commissioning for the facility with the Merseyside Recycling and Waste Authority, and CPME supports the facility with service and parts. CPME is a company formed in 2009 by CP and Ken Mills Engineering, a 50/50 owned company located in Rochdale, about 40 miles from the facility.

The single stream system features a dual feed into a single line and includes equipment by CP Manufacturing-- a 2-deck OCCScreen, a 3-deck Glass Breaker Screen and Glass Cleanup System, NEWScreen, VScreen, magnetic separators, an Accelerator Screen, and an Air Drum Separator by CP’s partner Ken Mills Engineering.

The facility has two IPS balers—the multi-material 2-Ram 1052, which has a patented Pre-Compression Lid that increases the baler’s speed and tonnages. The facility also has an IPS Conquest™, a hinge-side auto-tie baler for baling all fibers. IPS Balers has been a division of the CP Group since 2006.

After the materials are separated and recovered at the facility, most of it is to be reprocessed into new products at secondary processing facilities, while some of the non-recyclable waste is sent for energy conversion.

Morrison continues,” This is a facility that will serve the recycling needs of the Liverpool area for years to come as well as being a facility that the community can be very proud of.  Every effort has been made to make sure that there is no negative impact on the surrounding community.  Many locals that I spoke with were aware of the beautiful new building, but had no idea that it contained a large scale recycling operation.”

Veolia leverages the Gillmoss facility as a learning center to help increase recycling rates in surrounding areas.

The facility features the “Recycling Discovery Centre”, an education center for use by local schools and communities. The learning center allows visitors to see the sorting equipment in operation; the CCTV video cameras allow for close-up views of the system. Viewing platforms and an activity room with interactive displays about recycling teach visitors about the process and how they can help recycle more.

The CP Group includes CP Manufacturing, Krause Manufacturing, MSS, IPS Balers and Advanced MRF. The CP Group is a world leader in engineering and manufacturing material recovery facilities.

For more information, please visit www.theCPgrp.com and www.cpmfg.com.

CP Group and Veolia Team up for Unique MRF in UK

State-of-the-art facility includes High-tech equipment, Learning Center, & Green Construction

RELATED KEYWORDS

MOST POPULAR RELATED SEARCHES


Post a new comment
Post your comment
View comments

Showing 1 to 7 (oldest first)

Venkatesh Shenoi
Venkatesh Shenoi Comment  Jun. 28, 2012
Well done, regrettably most UK councils are in the stone age with multiple bin collections, kerbside sort, etc, costing huge amounts for the taxpayers and little or no benefit to the environment. Recycling is seen as a religion - superstition whether it benefits the environment or not and regardless of cost.. Best to collect the lot in one bin weekly, and the sort out at a central facility, and send material of low resale value to an incinerator.
Robert Leeftink
Robert Leeftink Comment  Jul. 1, 2012
I would not expect too much of it. Recently reviewed a multi million dollar facility built by CP. with a recovery rate of no more than 4 percent. Almost all unit operations are really drap.
Ashley Davis
Ashley Davis Comment  Jul. 2, 2012
@Robert Leeftink -- Hi Robert, which facility did you review? None of our facilities have a recovery rate that low and you are misinformed. I am curious to know which facility it is that you reviewed, and your credibility behind your statements.
Robert Leeftink
Robert Leeftink Comment  Jul. 2, 2012
Hi Ashley, I am not misinformed and I am willing to send you the information required. You can contact me via Decistor.com.
Venkatesh Shenoi
Venkatesh Shenoi Comment  Jul. 2, 2012
You guys may wish to see: http://www.wyg.com/recyclingreview/WYG_Report_-_Review_of_Kerbside_Recycling_Collection_Schemes_in_the_UK_in_2010-11.pdf and http://www.ciwm.co.uk/CIWM/Publications/LatestNews/ReportFindsSignificantBenefitsToCommingledCollections.aspx and recovery rate of 4% - not sure how this is calculated - and MRF will recover all the input into fractions - the question is what is put in and what the criteria of recovery is. A comingled collection, and MRF allows recovery to suit the market value of the materials needed to be taken out - with the rest sent to landfill or to a waste to energy plant. In fact best to site such facilities close to a WEF. -
Ashley Davis
Ashley Davis Comment  Jul. 2, 2012
@Venkatesh Shenoi thank you for the comment and the article links, I agree with you that there are differing criteria for calculating recovery rates for different material types, and operator goals.
Ashley Davis
Ashley Davis Comment  Jul. 2, 2012
@Robert Leeftink -- I will contact you directly, I am very curious about your statement since our systems, even the "dirtiest" MSW MRFs, have higher recovery rates. I look forward to clarifying what you are saying.
RELATED NEWS


Air & ClimateEnergy & RenewablesEnvironmental ManagementHealth & SafetyMonitoring & TestingSoil & GroundwaterWaste & RecyclingWater & Wastewater