The evaluations were performed:
of the towers for indications of biofilm growth and composition,
determination of the microbial content of treated cooling tower water utilizing
nationally recognized standard methods,
- Formation of
bacterial biofilms on glass coupons,
of artificially created biofilm containing bacteria and algae,
of assimilable organic carbon levels in samples,
- Effect of post-Dolphin treated water on bacterial viability.
All towers evaluated operated at 10 to 27° C depending on the season and the cooling tower's utilization pattern. The Dolphin treated towers had a pH range of 8.3 to 8.5, while the chemically treated towers had a pH range of 7.5 to 8.3.
Visual examination of towers indicated the presence of significant biofilm and algal mats in those under chemical control, especially during summer months, whereas there was little or no biofilm or algal mat formation in the water of Dolphin treated towers. These conditions on the Dolphin treated towers existed even after two years of operation without physical cleaning of the tower systems. The Dolphin treated towers did not have any odors from microbial byproducts, while the chemically treated towers did have such odors in the summer months. Measurement of assimilable organic carbon (AOC) in the Dolphin treated tower indicated a level of approximately 700 m g AOC/L, an amount that has the ability to support considerable bacterial growth.
The bacterial plate counts were performed by spreading 0.1 ml of diluted sample onto Standard Methods agar (SMA) and incubating for 48 hours at 35° C. Also, microbial counts were taken on R2A medium after five days at 28° C of incubation. The results indicate that the bacterial populations were significantly lower in water from Dolphin treated cooling towers. Typical quantitative values are as follows:
Measurement of biofilm formation on glass coupons indicted that biofilm formation in three weeks was seven-fold greater in chemically treated towers than in Dolphin treated towers. The chemically-treated tower cell population peaked at a bacterial concentration of 1x107 bacteria/cm2.
Artificially prepared biofilms, containing Anabaena and Chlorella (isolated from the walls of cooling towers) and a mixture of native
|bacterial species, were examined after 1 to 5 weeks of incubation in Dolphin treated cooling towers. At the end of one week, 98% of the Anabaena population was no longer attached to the coupon, and after three weeks the Chlorella population was reduced 90%. Control biofilms in aged chlorine-free water contained 80-87 % of the original number of photosynthetic organisms in the biofilm.|
|When bacteria were incubated with water from Dolphin-treated towers and tested for cell viability after various periods of incubation, it was found that the Dolphin-treated water had significant antibacterial activity. The gram negative bacteria species tested included: Escherichia coli, Enterobacter cloacae, Pseudomonas flourescens and Klebsialla pneumoniae. The gram positive bacteria species tested included: Streptococcus salivaris, Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus saprophyticus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. The gram negative organisms, most of which were coliforms, were extremely sensitive to the|
|agent in Dolphin treated water, but the gram positive organisms tested demonstrated only limited inactivation. Treating the samples with sodium thiosulfate or lowering the pH to 7.3 with hydrochloric acid blocked the bacteriocidal effect. The bacterial inactivating ability of the Dolphin-treated water lasted for a least one month after storage at 4° C.|
Cooling towers under Dolphin control retained a high quality of water with a lower bacterial count, free of chlorine disinfectants, for a long period of time without special maintenance. Dolphin pulsed-power treatment appears to produce an anti-microbial effect responsible for a decrease in the levels of microorganisms present, a large decrease in biofilm formation and an improvement in the water quality attributes of clarity and odor.