The Aquascope 3 can be used by inexperienced operators to find leaks - Case study
In 2006 the Calgary Water Authority in Canada engaged a British consultancy firm called “Hydrosave” to assist them reduce their leakage from 12% of all water supplied and ILI ratings of 4 – 8 between the different DMAs.
The temperature in Calgary gets down to -40 degrees Celcius in the winter and the water board’s staff are fully occupied in winter, however in summer they have surplus staff and only 4 staff trained in leak detection. With thousands of fittings to survey in a very short summer it would not be possible for these 4 operators to survey a substancial part of the network or worth trying to train more operators.
Hydrosave developed a leak detection methodology that enabled the inexperienced surplus staff to go and perform an acoustic sounding survey listening on all fittings and recording the noise levels produced by the Aquascope 3. The operators were sent out without the headphones and the values recorded were used to localise the leak positions using noise clustering principals.
The average daily distance listening on all fittings was 5.8km/day and the average daily distance listening on fire hydrants only was 14.2km/day. Once the operator returned, all of the sounding levels collected we entered into a computer sequentially and displayed graphically. An example of one of these graphs can be seen in Figure 3. The spikes in the graph indicate areas of interest where investigation is required to determine if a leak is in the area.
The skilled leakage operators investigated and pinpointed the leaks at the sites identified as having higher noise levels with the Aquascope 3 ground microphone.
This localisation technique proved to be extremely effective and maximised the efficiency of the skilled and unskilled operators.