Climate Change Performance Index: Global Shift Needs Further Action

0

Source: Worldwatch Institute

Global CO2 emissions rise at lower rates, giving some reason to hope for limiting climate change | Canada and Australia worst performers of all industrialized countries

Lima -- Global emissions have reached a new peak, but recent developments indicate a new readiness for action on climate protection. This is the message of the 10th edition of the Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI); a ranking of the climate protection performance of the 58 highest emitters worldwide published by Germanwatch and CAN Europe at the UN Climate Conference in Lima yesterday.

'We see global trends, indicating promising shifts in some of the most relevant sectors for climate protection', says Jan Burck (Germanwatch), author of the Index. 'The rise of emissions has slowed down, and renewables are rapidly growing due to declining costs and massive investments.'

In some countries like Denmark (Rank 4), Sweden (Rank 5) and the United Kingdom (Rank 6) the result is decreasing emissions. On the other side of the globe China, the world's biggest emitter, shows improvements in the efficiency sector and massive investments in renewables. Most recent developments indicate China's decade long coal boom seems to be over, offering new hope for global climate protection.

In the United States (Rank 44), “the Obama White House has recently sent strong signals to the world that it is more committed than ever to reducing carbon emissions,” says Alexander Ochs (Worldwatch Institute), Director of Climate and Energy. “The U.S. government’s agreement with China on greenhouse gas cuts in both countries, its proactive work in the Energy Ministerial and other international fora, and its supportive tone in the UN climate negotiations are reflected in an improved grade for International Climate Policy this year. However, given the U.S. Congress’ inability—and in the case of many members, unwillingness—to pass effective climate and energy policies, the President’s possibilities are limited.” [View the United States Scorecard].

“Progress on the necessary transition to a low-emission, climate-compatible society remains chiefly driven by individual U.S. states and municipalities. Therefore, the U.S. 2015 overall ranking did not improve from last year’s. In contrast, several developing or emerging economies—including major emitters like China (Rank 45), India (Rank 31), Indonesia (Rank 23), and Mexico (Rank 18)—are scoring higher this year, due to decisive national action,” adds Ochs.

'Data showing declining emission growth rates together with promising political signs, suggesting that we are able to stabilize global emissions. The Paris Climate Summit in 2015, where countries will make new commitments for climate action, could be a turning point in this respect,' adds Burck.

In Europe, the Index shows a mixed picture: 'Many EU countries ranked high this year, but others, like Poland (Rank 40) and Bulgaria (Rank 41) scored poorly because of their opposition to further steps nationally and in the EU,' explains Wendel Trio, Director of CAN Europe.

'Neither the current 2020 nor the new 2030 climate target are in line with the reductions needed by Europe to avert catastrophic climate change and achieve 100% renewables by 2050. To do this, Europe must meet its target to reduce energy consumption by 20% by 2020 against projections, phase out all fossil fuel subsidies immediately and agree on a fundamental reform of its Emissions Trading Scheme before the Paris Climate Summit”, Trio concludes.

One of the biggest winners in the new Index is Morocco. It jumped into the Top Ten because of its extraordinary renewables policy. With a very good international climate policy evaluation, Mexico also ranks among the Top 20.

In Canada (Rank 58) nothing has changed and nothing is going forward at the state level. For industrialized countries, this bad performance is only beaten by Australia (Rank 60), where the new conservative government reversed the climate policies previously in effect. In between these two, Kazakhstan (Rank 59) and at the very bottom Saudi Arabia (Rank 61) comprise the bottom four.

About CCPI: The CCPI is a tool designed to enhance transparency in international climate politics. On the basis of standardized criteria, the Index evaluates and compares the climate protection performance of 58 countries that are together responsible for more than 90% of the global energy-related CO2 emissions. The first three ranks are left out because no country is acting enough to prevent dangerous climate change. (More about the methodology can be found in the brochure “The Climate Change Performance Index—Background and Methodology”).

About Germanwatch: Germanwatch, based in Bonn and Berlin (Germany), is an independent development and environmental organization which works for sustainable global development. It actively promotes North-South equity and the preservation of livelihoods (www.germanwatch.org/en)

About the Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe: CAN Europe is Europe’s largest coalition working on climate and energy issues. With over 120 member organizations in more than 25 European countries, CAN Europe works to prevent dangerous climate change and promote sustainable energy and environment policy in Europe (www.caneurope.org).

About the Worldwatch Institute: Worldwatch is an independent research organization based in Washington, D.C. that works on energy, resource, and environmental issues. The Worldwatch Institute has contributed country analysis to the CCPI for many years. Worldwatch Institute delivers the insights and ideas that empower decision makers to create an environmentally sustainable society that meets human needs (www.worldwatch.org).

Customer comments

No comments were found for Climate Change Performance Index: Global Shift Needs Further Action. Be the first to comment!