Global warming `has reduced maize and wheat yields`


Source: SciDev.Net

Global warming has already reduced the global yields of key crops, say scientists.

Maize and wheat production have been 3.8 and 5.5 per cent lower, respectively, than they would have been without the temperature rises associated with climate change since the 1980s, according to the statistical analysis.

Rice and soya yields have dropped in some parts of the world and risen in others, so overall the warming has not changed their net global production.

Linking climate change to food prices for the first time, the scientists, led by David Lobell of Stanford University, United States, have shown that these losses have probably led to at least a six per cent rise in food prices between 1980 and 2008.

The news comes as the UN this week (3 May) revised upwards its population prediction for the planet — to 10.1 billion by 2100.

'Without successful adaptation, and given the persistent rise in demand for maize and wheat, the sizeable yield setback from climate change is likely incurring large economic and health costs,' said the team, whose work was published in Science yesterday (5 May).

The team developed two models of crop productivity using data from countries around the world. Both models included complex factors such as the increases in yield from technological advances in farming, but one included the actual increase in global temperatures between 1980–2008, while the other kept the temperature constant at 1980 levels.

For maize, warming was linked with a reduced yield of around eight per cent in Brazil and seven per cent in China, but an increase of about one per cent in India. In Africa, there were significant yield drops in Egypt, Mozambique and Uganda, but substantial increases, linked to temperature drops, in Kenya, Tunisia and Zambia.

Wheat productivity in the developing world was significantly reduced in Afghanistan, Brazil, Iraq, Libya and Morocco.

And, although the global productivity of soya remained level, Brazil experienced a drop of five per cent, and Paraguay 7.5 per cent, while Argentina showed a 2.5 per cent increase.

The study did not take into account the fertilising effect of extra carbon dioxide in the atmosphere — thought to increase yields for rice and soy but have no effect on maize and wheat.

'We are not saying climate change is the only or even a major cause of price increases for major commodities,' Lobell told SciDev.Net. 'Most people would say biofuel and trade policies are probably more important for food price rises. But what we are saying is that climate change is also a factor.'

Gerald Nelson, a senior research fellow at the International Food Policy Research Institute in the United States said the results demonstrated that 'the way climate plays out in individual locations in the future is going to be very important for global effects'.

For developing countries it underlined the urgency of adapting agriculture to climate change — and building better infrastructure so that farmers can benefit from higher prices for their crops, he said.

Customer comments

  1. By Meme Mine on

    -The thousands of consensus scientists were silent when Obama never even mentioned the climate crisis in his Feb./2011 State of the Union Speech. -The thousands of consensus scientists were silent when American IPCC funding was pulled. -If the crisis were real, the thousands of scientists would have been marching in the streets after their warnings of crisis were ignored. -How is it that there were always countless thousands of consensus scientists out numbering protestors? -Thousands of consensus scientists also produced cruise missiles, cancer causing chemical cocktails, land mine technology, nuclear weapons, germ warfare, cluster bombs, strip mining technology, Y2K, Y2Kyoto, deep sea drilling technology and now climate control. -It was the thousands of consensus scientists themselves that originally polluted the planet with their pesticides and cancer causing chemicals they created, thus making environmentalism necessary in the first place. -The effects were predicted by the thousands of consensus scientists to be “negligible to unstoppable warming”. So what’s not to agree with. -Former Climate Change believers are now the voting majority so CO2 mitigations of sacrifice and taxes will never happen. -A wave of other former climate change believers are now demanding that politicians and law makers have the leading scientists and especially the unconscionable leading news editors, subjected to criminal charges for knowingly sustaining the criminal exaggerations of the CO2 mistake. -REAL planet lovers are happy about avoiding a crisis. -REAL civilized people don’t threaten their kids with DEATH BY CO2, just to get them to turn the lights out more often. -How did melting ice on top of tropical fossils prove what caused it this time after eons of the powers of the cosmos doing it? -If after 25 years of the CO2 mistake, you still believe in this coming h e l l, at least act like it and get yourself a sign that says THE END IS NEAR and start marching. -Believers are the new deniers and history is watching this madness. -Climate Change belief was selfish, thoughtless and verging on psychotic and will be viewed as modern day witch burning another Iraq-like false war against a false enemy based on climate weapons of mass destruction. -25 years of this needless panic made Bush look like an angel.