Environmental Insurance Agency, Inc.
7 Articles found

Environmental Insurance Agency, Inc. articles

Environmental engineers and others involved with brownfields redevelopment have increasingly come to appreciate the role of the new environmental insurance products in financing environmental liability risk. Most have probably heard of cleanup cost cap insurance

Jan. 1, 2001

Susan Neuman

 This article addresses two aspects of the new environmental insurance policies for lenders (usually referred to as Secured Creditor, or SC, policies): that of the sometimes significant differences among the policies now on the market, and the controversial due diligence issue - whether the policies can be a `substitute` for environmental due diligence or a Phase I. The four major environmental carriers offer five off-the-shelf forms to protect the lender from his or her environmental l
Apr. 1, 2000

Susan Neuman

 More sophisticated insurance tools are making it earier to protect your property

Contaminated properties represent a huge investment opportunity, but much of it lies untapped because of environmental liability concerns. Anyone who buys property that is actually or potentially contaminated should consider it as a risk management option, and they should do so very early in the brownfield transaction process. Two types of insurance policies are now available that provide

Dec. 1, 1999

Susan Neuman

 An article by this author in the December 1999 issue of Brownfield News analyzed two new environmental insurance products, the cleanup cost cap and pollution liability policies, which have proven to be key factors in the success of some contaminated property transactions. The article explained that, to achieve this success, environmental insurance experts need to tailor the policy to the transaction and to the liability for which coverage is sought. This tailoring-partly negotiating, p
Dec. 1, 1999

Susan Neuman

Introduction

In Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co., the New Jersey Supreme Court held that, in allocating insurance coverage for indivisible losses that trigger multiple coverage periods, the policyholder must share pro rata responsibility1 for self-insured, under-insured, and uninsured periods. When the policyholder has decided to forego insurance, as opposed to periods in which insurance was2 unavailable, it was reasonable to expect the policyholder to share in the al

Dec. 1, 1998

Susan Neuman;

 Traditional risk management posits a rational, five-step process for managing risks. The outstanding differences between this traditional process and the environmental risk management process lie in the technicality and complexity of step one (identifying and analyzing environmental risk) and of the first part of step two (examining the feasibility of  alternative risk management, specifically risk control techniques). The two main differences between the environmental risk manage
Nov. 1, 1998

Susan Neuman

 Part One

Introduction

Real estate transactions with environmental problems often founder on attempts to shift the liabilities from one party to the other. In transactions with other types of problems, insurance is a popular risk transfer mechanism,  and is regularly used for that purpose, but it is used far less often when there are environmental risks. This so-called `environmental insurance gap` in real estate transactions has often, and correc

Feb. 1, 1998

Susan Neuman