13th International AquaConSoil Conference 2015 - Detailed Programme

1  1 Preliminary program                                                             1  2  Conference overview Monday 8 June 14:00-18:00 Pre-conference courses (See www.aquaconsoil.org for details) 18:30-20:00 Welcome reception in town hall Tuesday 9 June 9:00-10:30 Plenary opening session ? Welcome by chairmen ? Presentation by hosting country ? Scientific key lecture by Prof. Poul Løgstrup Bjerg (Technical University of Denmark)10:30-11:00 Break 11:00-12:30 Parallel lecture sessions and special sessions See next pages for details per session 12:30-14:00 Lunch 14:00-15:30 Parallel lecture sessions and special sessions See next pages for details per session 15:30-16:00 Break 16:00-17:30 Parallel lecture sessions and special sessions See next pages for details per session 17:30-18:30 Poster social event The overview of posters will be provided soon Wednesday 10 June 9:00-10:30 Parallel lecture sessions and special sessions & matchmaking See next pages for details per session; details about matchmaking will be provided soon 10:30-11:00 Break 11:00-12:30 Parallel lecture sessions and special sessions & matchmaking See next pages for details per session; details about matchmaking will be provided soon 12:30-14:00 Lunch 14:00-15:30 Parallel lecture sessions and special sessions & matchmaking See next pages for details per session; details about matchmaking will be provided soon 15:30-16:00 Break 16:00-17:30 Parallel lecture sessions and special sessions & matchmaking See next pages for details per session; details about matchmaking will be provided soon Thursday 11 June 9:00-10:30 Parallel lecture sessions and special sessions See next pages for details per session 10:30-11:00 Break 11:00-12:30 Parallel lecture sessions and special sessions See next pages for details per session 12:30-14:00 Lunch 14:00-15:30 Parallel lecture sessions and special sessions See next pages for details per session 15:30-16:00 Break 16:00-17:30 Parallel lecture sessions and special sessions See next pages for details per session 20:00 Conference dinner Friday 12 June 9:00-10:30 Parallel lecture sessions and special sessions See next pages for details per session 10:30-11:00 Break 11:00-12:00 Plenary session ? Conference highlights by AquaConSoil chairmen ? Panel discussion on future developments ? Poster awards 12:30 (start) Technical tours Tour 1 – Novel methods for investigation and remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater Tour 2 – Inspirational tour: Historical contaminated sites in Copenhagen, redevelopment today Tour 3 – Innovations in subsurface utilization Tour 4 –Sustainability and climate change preparation in urban development of brownfields See www.aquaconsoil.org for details (‘Events-tours’) 3  Lecture sessions and special sessions Note: This is the preliminary program, minor changes may occur. Lecture sessions and special sessions per day and time slot Tuesday 9 June page 4 - 13 Wednesday 10 June page 14 - 25 Thursday 11 June page 26 - 37 Friday 12 June page 38 - 40 4  Explanation: Hall number Regular thematic session (ThS) or Special session (SpS) lecture title, presenter, co-authors, (institution, country) Meeting Room 19 ThS 1A.1 Passive sampling ? Passive sampling for monitoring fate and transport of organic contaminants – field examples Sarah Hale, Hans Peter Arp, Nicolas Morin, Gudny Okkenhaug, Gijs Breedveld, Mona Hansen, Espen Eek, Paul Cappelen, Gerard Cornelissen, Amy Oen (Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, NO). ? Environmental forensic in groundwater by coupling passive sampling and high resolution mass spectrometry for non-target screening Coralie Soulier, Catherine Berho, Anne Togola (Brgm, DL) ? Development and test of optical sensor for real time measurement of volatile organic contaminants in air Mette Christophersen, Lars Bennedsen, Jeppe Seidelin Dam, Peter Tidemand Lichtenberg, Christian Pedersen, Nancy Hamburger, Helena Hansen, Mads Terkelsen (Rambøll Denmark, DK) ? Integrated passive flux measurements in groundwater: Principles and outlook Goedele Verreydt, Patrick Meire, Eric Struyf, Ilse Van Keer, Piet Seuntjens (University of Antwerp, BE) ? Innovative assessment and modeling tools to minimize confounding elements in vapor intrusion investigations Todd Creamer (Geosyntec Consultants, GB) Auditorium 11 ThS 1C.9 Bioremediation of chlorinated solvents in groundwater 1 ? Effects of aquifer thermal energy storage on bioremediation of chlorinated ethenes Zhuobiao Ni, Martijn Smit, Tim Grotenhuis (Wageningen University, NL), Pauline van Gaans (Deltares, NL), Huub Rijnaarts (Wageningen University, NL) ? "Post-mortem" of a successful ERD project in a German urban area Laura Simone, Thomas Held (ARCADIS Deutschland GmbH, DE) ? Bioremediation at low pH - emerging tools and approaches for chlorinated solvent sites Jeff Roberts, Phil Dennis, Peter Dollar, Sandra Dworatzek (SiREM, CA) ? Aerobic biodegradation of trichloroethene without auxiliary substrates Kathrin Rachel Schmidt, Sarah Gaza, Andreas Tiehm (The German Water Centre - TZW, DE) ? Meeting the challenges for bioremediation of chlorinated solvents posed at operational sites: a comparison of case studies Richard Bewley, Paula Hick, Anthea Rawcliffe (URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited, GB) Auditorium 12 ThS 1C.18 Miscellaneous remediation topics 1 ? Intensive CSM development providing data for concise design of containment Koen Enkels, Karolien Claeys, Bram De Keulenaere, Bart Callens, Karen Van Geert, Wouter Gevaerts, Gerlinde De Moor (ARCADIS Belgium nv, BE) ? Applying numerical contaminants’ F&T modelling for designing effective groundwater remediation strategies Aleksandra Kiecak, Grzegorz Malina, Ewa Kret, Tadeusz Szklarczyk (AGH University of Science and Technology, PL) ? In-situ chemical reduction: laboratory and pilot-scale studies for full-scale treatment of chromium VI contaminated soils Aldo Trezzi, Sara Ceccon, Roberto Pisterna (Environ, IT), Domenico Osella (Università del Piemonte Orientale, IT), Roberto De Franco (CNR IDPA, IT), Caterina Di Carlo Tuesday 9 June 11:00-12:30 5  (Solvay Specialty Polymers Italy SpA, IT), Pierre Matz (Solvay SA, BE), Davide Musso (Università del Piemonte Orientale, IT), Grazia Caielli (CNR IDPA, IT) ? Use of numerical models for understanding and design of surfactant enhanced remediation Søren Rygaard Lenschow, Anders Christensen (NIRAS, DK), Mette Marie Mygind (Danish Ministry of Defense, DK), Phillip C. DeBlanc, Ahmad Seyedabbasi (GSI Environmental Inc., US), Konstantinos Kostarelos (University of Houston, US) ? Colloidal Fe-zeolites - A novel material for sorption-supported in-situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) Anett Georgi, Glenn Gillies, Katrin Mackenzie, Frank-Dieter Kopinke (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, DE) Meeting Room 20 SpS 1D.4S The Danish approach to holistic groundwater resource management Organizers: The Danish Knowledge Exchange Group Groundwater is the foundation for 99% of the Danish drinking water supply and is to a large extent utilized for irrigation of farmlands. After simple treatment, the water is ready for distribution to the consumers. This is possible because the groundwater resource is generally uncontaminated in Denmark due to a plentiful natural resource with a relatively long transport time from surface to aquifer, a long tradition for generation of knowledge about the groundwater as well as a public will to protect this resource. The Danish model builds on a tradition of planning based on resource and nature protection and a large degree of trust between authorities and involved parties. This session will give an insight into why and how great financial resources (approx. 2.7 billion DKK) have been spent to map and understand the groundwater aquifers’ locations, extent and transport pathways for groundwater formation in Denmark. The session will be concluded by relating gains and challenges still-to-come with regard to mapping and managing the groundwater resource as well as by comparing the Danish model to other those of other countries. Polling equipment will be available to the audience during this session. Polling questions will be asked during the individual presentations and especially during the panel discussion. Results will appear on-screen immediately and be an integral part of the discussions. Program: ? Drivers and political background for the ”Danish model” with groundwater focus Presenter from the Danish Environmental Ministry (15 minutes) ? Involved parties in the Danish model and interfaces – what data are produced, how are they utilized and further developed at each stage (60 minutes) Presentations about groundwater mapping, presenters form the Danish Nature Agency and the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Presentation by a municipality about protective action plans Short introduction to contaminated site management to ensure groundwater protection, presenter from a region ? (Panel)discussion (15 minutes) Meeting Room 18 SpS 2.2S “Towards Urban Land Management 2065” – Brownfields the secret weapon for sustainable cities Organizers: Maaike Blauw, Linda Maring (Deltares, NL) Hans van Duijne (Deltares/WU, NL) on behalf of EU FP7 HOMBRE and EU Snowman Balance4P consortium Brownfield sites are the secret weapon for sustainable European cities. Although these sites often have contamination problems and require intervention to bring them back into beneficial use, they are also often in the right place to deliver profitable places for people. This is in line with the perspective of EU flagship initiative “A resource efficient Europe”, where land is seen as a valuable and multi-purpose resource. In this session, perspectives of land management achieving this goal are presented. In addition, the EU Urban Agenda will have an important role in achieving the target of Resource efficient cities. Therefore in this session we will discuss about what research and developments are needed to enable cities contributing to a resource efficient Europe, which can be used as input for the Urban Agenda. 6  Program: ? Presentation: Zero Brownfield Perspective: explain framework, how it works and remaining questions (15min) ? Presentation: EU Urban Agenda (15min) ? Discussion: Towards Urban Land Management 2065: what research and development is needed to enable that cities contribute positively to a resource efficient Europe (45 min) Conclusions and further actions (15 min) 7  Explanation: Hall number Regular thematic session (ThS) or Special session (SpS) lecture title, presenter, co-authors, (institution, country) Meeting room 19 SpS 1B.2Sa Workshop on groundwater contamination from pesticide point sources Part I Organizers: Ida Holm Olesen (Region of Southern Denmark, DK), Nina Tuxen (Orbicon A/S, DK), Poul L. Bjerg (Technical Universty of Denmark, DK) Moderator: Poul L. Bjerg (Technical Universty of Denmark, DK) Pesticides are among the most widespread contaminants in the European groundwater. Recent findings in Denmark indicate that between 20 and 45% of the pesticide findings in the groundwater can be attributed to point sources. Danish researchers, authorities and consultants have developed innovative tools for data analysis, catchment scale risk assessment and remediation. We believe we are on the right path, but we are very well aware that we have not yet found the recipe for efficient management of pesticide-point sources. Judged by the limited amount of literature on pesticide point sources available, it seems that other European countries are in a similar situation. Therefore, the aim of this workshop is knowledge exchange and mutual inspiration on the topic of pesticide point sources. Ideally, the session will facilitate forming of new European partnerships on further research and development among authorities, consultants and researchers. All participants are invited to contribute to knowledge exchange by brief presentations and participation in discussions on key issues. Program: ? Introduction to the workshop by Poul L. Bjerg ? Ice breaker: the participants introduce themselves to each other ? Pesticides in the environment – sources, pathways, receptors and environmental challenges Poul L. Bjerg (Technical Universty of Denmark, DK) ? Challenges related to pesticide point-source contamination of groundwater Ida Holm Olesen (Region of Southern Denmark, DK) ? Finding the significant pesticide-point sources – an overview of approaches available Nina Tuxen (Orbicon A/S, DK) ? Short presentations from other European countries Part II of this workshop is scheduled for Tuesday 9 June 16:00-17:30. Auditorium 10 SpS 1B.1S Implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive – how to manage contaminated sites threatening surface waters Organizers: Sandra Roost (Orbicon A/S, DK), Jens Aabling (Danish Environmental Protection Agency, DK), Nina Tuxen (Orbicon A/S, DK), Trine Korsgaard (Region of Southern Denmark, DK), Helle Overgaard (The Capital Region of Denmark, DK) The implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive requires an integrating and holistic approach to legislation for water bodies with a goal of obtaining good environmental status for all receiving waters. While the risk from contaminated sites to groundwater has received a great deal of attention in the past, the risk from contaminated sites to surface waters (streams, lakes and coastal waters) has not yet been well examined. In Denmark alone there are more than 30,000 contaminated sites registered – many of them located close to surface waters. However, the hypothesis is that only a minor part of these sites actually pose a real risk towards surface waters. Thus a robust method is needed to identify the few relevant sites which still comply with the precautionary principle. Together with leading experts from universities, consulting companies and regional authorities, the Danish EPA developed a screening tool to identify contaminated sites that threaten surface waters. The screening system integrates national data of the contaminated sites: location, Tuesday 9 June 14:00-15:30 8  distance to surface waters, contamination activity, contaminant area and mass flux and calculates the mixing in surface waters. Program: ? Experience with the Water Framework Directive and contaminated sites in the Netherlands ? Challenges and experience for the Danish authorities in screening and identifying contaminated sites threatening surface waters in Denmark speaker to be defined (Danish Regions, DK) Auditorium 11 ThS 1C.10 Bioremediation of chlorinated solvents in groundwater 2 ? SILPHES – Investigation of chemical treatments for the remediation of recalcitrant chlorinated solvents: at the roots the development of an innovative in situ eco-friendly process Romain Rodrigues, Stéphanie Betelu, Frédéric Garnier, Stéfan Colombano (BRGM, FR), Antoine Joubert (Serpol,FR), David Cazaux (SOLVAY, FR), Guillaume Masselot (Ademe, FR), Theodore Tzedakis (Laboratoire de Génie Chimique, FR), Ioannis Ignatiadis (BRGM, FR) ? Dichloroelimination of polychlorinated alkanes by a Dehalogenimonas-containing enrichment culture Ernest Marco-Urrea, Lucia Martín-González,Siti Hatijah Mortan (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, ES), Lorenz Adrian (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, DE), Maira Martínez-Alonso, Nuria Gaju, Eloi Parladé (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, ES), Mònica Rosell (Universitat de Barcelona - UB, ES), Teresa Vicent, Glòria Caminal (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, ES) ? Fully automated enhanced biodegradation of chlorinated ethenes with an on sit anaerobic bioreactor Gerard Borggreve, Albert Smits (NTP Enviro Netherlands, NL), Adri Nipshagen (Bioclear, NL), Rene Tjassens, Michiel Pluim (Municipality The Hague, NL) ? Bioremediation of chlorinated solvents under low groundwater temperatures and in low permeability strata Phil Dennis, Jeff Roberts, Sandra Dworatzek, Peter Dollar (SiREM, CA) ? Bioaugmentation with optimized in-situ culture propagation (BACAd) Johan Gemoets, Queenie Simons (VITO nv, BE), Baue Boonen (RSK Benelux, DE) 9  Auditorium 12 ThS 1C.14 Combined treatment technologies 1 ? Remediation and restoration of the Lac Megantic, Quebec oil train disaster Todd Schwendeman, Jocelyn Marcotte, Bruce Noble (Aecom, CA) ? Combined remedy benefits of integrated physical, chemical and biological treatments on a 14 million litre fuel spill in a Swedish forest Kristin Forsberg, Jonny Bergman (RGS 90 Sverige AB, SE), Jeremy Birnstingl (Regenesis, GB) ? DNAPL treated by application of surfactants followed by ISCO Petr Kozubek (Enacon, CZ), Jan Nemecek (ENACON s.r.o. & Technical University Liberec, CZ), Vladislav Knytl, Eliska Kosinova (DEKONTA a.s., CZ) ? Innovative approach to the remediation of contaminated groundwater Phil Studds (Ramboll UK Ltd, GB) ? Coupling groundwater recirculation by GCW and chemical/biological reductive processes for residual DNAPL source removal: lab investigation and large pilot testing Marco Petrangeli Papini, Mauro Majone, Lucia Pierro (University of Rome, IT), M. Sagliaschi, S. Sucato (EDF-Fenice, SpA, IT), Eduard Alesi, Ernst Bartsch (IEG Technologie GmbH, DE) Meeting Room 20 ThS 1C.1 Comparison of sustainable remediation approaches ? Comparison of international approaches to sustainable remediation Erika Rizzo (University Ca' Foscari Venice, IT), Paul Bardos (r3 environmental technology ltd, GB), Lisa Pizzol, Andrea Critto, Elisa Giubilato, Antonio Marcomini (University Ca' Foscari Venice, IT) ? Practical application for the SuRF-UK tool kit: sustainability management practices Paul Bardos (r3 environmental technology ltd, GB), Brian Bone (Bone Environmental Ltd, GB), Richard Boyle (Homes and Communities Agency, GB), Frank Evans (National Grid Property, GB), Nicola Harries (CL:AIRE, GB), Trevor Howard (Environment Agency, GB), Jonathan Smith (Shell Global Solutions (UK) Ltd, GB) ? Development of a green remediation tool for sustainability assessment of soil remediation in Japan Tetsuo Yasutaka (National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, JP), Yoshihito Hama, Yasuhisa Tsukada, Kouki Murayama (Tokyo Metropolitan Government, JP), Yasuhide Furukawa (Takenaka Corporation, JP) ? Recent trends in the assessment of sustainable remediation: Does the tail wag the dog? Gernot Döberl, Dietmar Müller-Grabherr (Environment Agency Austria, AT) ? A multi-criteria method for assessing the sustainability of remediation alternatives Gitte Lemming Søndergaard (Technical University of Denmark, DK), Morten Bondgaard (Central Denmark Region, DK), Philip J. Binning (Technical University of Denmark, DK), Kaspar Ruegg (Region Midtjylland, DK), Anja Melvej, Børge Hvidberg (Central Denmark Region, DK), Poul L. Bjerg (Technical Universty of Denmark, DK) Meeting Room 18 ThS 2.3 Redevelopment of brownfields 1 ? Maximising the value-proposition for soft re-use of brownfields Paul Bardos (r3 environmental technology ltd, GB), Ian Stephenson (Vertase-FLI, GB), Pierre Menger (TECNALIA, ES), Victor Beumer (Deltares, NL) ? The final countdown - “Successful remediation policies leads to the end of the Dutch Soil Protection Act” Michiel Gadella (Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, NL) ? Urban development on contaminated sites - collaboration between the municipalities and the Capital Region of Denmark Hanne Joergensen, Maria Hag (Capital Region of Denmark, DK), Annette Gundog Ferslev, Heidi Uttenthal Bay (Region Hovedstaden, DK) ? Integrated urban land management: an approach for assisting in sustainable redevelopment of contaminated brownfield sites in France Elsa Limasset (BRGM, FR), Agnès Laboudigue (Mines ParisTech, FR), Claire Alary (Mines Douai, FR), Jean-Luc Collet (Collet Architecte, FR), Stéphane Fourny (Artelia, FR), Hubert Léprond, Pascale Michel (Brgm, FR), Thomas Valeyre (Mines Douai, FR) 10  ? Soil from construction projects as a resource – recycling and sustainable soil management Joan Krogh (NIRAS A/S, DK)   11  Explanation: Hall number Regular thematic session (ThS) or Special session (SpS) lecture title, presenter, co-authors, (institution, country) Meeting room 19 SpS 1B.2Sb Workshop on groundwater contamination from pesticide point sources Part II Organizers: Ida Holm Olesen (Region of Southern Denmark, DK), Nina Tuxen (Orbicon A/S, DK), Poul L. Bjerg (Technical Universty of Denmark, DK) Moderator: Poul L. Bjerg (Technical Universty of Denmark, DK) Pesticides are among the most widespread contaminants in the European groundwater. Recent findings in Denmark indicate that between 20 and 45% of the pesticide findings in the groundwater can be attributed to point sources. Danish researchers, authorities and consultants have developed innovative tools for data analysis, catchment scale risk assessment and remediation. We believe we are on the right path, but we are very well aware that we have not yet found the recipe for efficient management of pesticide-point sources. Judged by the limited amount of literature on pesticide point sources available, it seems that other European countries are in a similar situation. Therefore, the aim of this workshop is knowledge exchange and mutual inspiration on the topic of pesticide point sources. Ideally, the session will facilitate forming of new European partnerships on further research and development among authorities, consultants and researchers. All participants are invited to contribute to knowledge exchange by brief presentations and participation in discussions on key issues. Program: ? Plenary discussion following the presentations at the end of part I ? Remediation technologies for pesticide-point sources Katerina Tsitonaki (Orbicon A/S, DK) ? Group discussion: identification of new tools and management approaches and needs for development ? Plenary discussion and summary of the session, Poul L. Bjerg Part I of this workshop is scheduled for Tuesday 9 June 14:00-15:30. Auditorium 10 ThS 1A.2 Molecular monitoring ? Bacterial community structure and biogeochemical activity in an aquifer contaminated with pesticides Aourell Mauffret, Nicole Baran, Mickael Charron, Catherine Joulian (Brgm, FR) ? Assessment of microbial polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) degradation in a contaminated aquifer using in situ and laboratory microcosms with 13C-labelled PAHs Petra Bombach (Isodetect GmbH, DE), Arne Bahr, Carsten Vogt (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, DE), Anko Fischer (Isodetect GmbH, DE) ? Microbial passive samplers: how reliable? Jean-Michel Monier, Cédric Malandain, Celine Baguelin, Olivier Sibourg (ENOVEO, FR) ? Microbial responses to biostimulation and bioaugmentation – a 2-year long pilot trial to evaluate molecular sampling techniques Helena Branzén, Märta Ländell, Lennart Larsson, Anja Enell (Swedish Geotechnical Institute, SE) ? Integrated characterization of the development in natural attenuation of a PCE plume over 7 years after thermal remediation of the source zone with use of dual stable isotope and microbial methods Mette Martina Broholm (Technical University of Denmark, DK), Alice Badin (University of Neuchatel, CH), Carsten Suhr Jacobsen (Geological Survey of Greenland and Denmark, DK), Phil Dennis (SiREM, CA), Just Niels (Region of Southern Denmark, DK), Daniel Hunkeler (University of Neuchatel, CH) Tuesday 9 June 16:00-17:30 12  Auditorium 11 ThS 1C.20 New remediation technologies 1 ? Pesticide contaminated groundwater – Use of electrochemical oxidation and NF/RO membranes for energy efficient treatment Henrik Tækker Madsen, Jens Muff, Erik Søgaard (Aalborg University, DK) ? Challenges and hopes for scaling up an electrodialytic remediation method for treating CCA contaminated soil Krzysztof Kowalski (Technical University of Denmark, DK), Sanne Skov Nielsen (Orbicon A/S, DK), Pernille Erland Jensen (Technical University of Denmark, DK), Thomas Hauerberg Larsen (Orbicon A/S, DK), Mads Terkelsen (Capital Region, DK), Lisbeth Ottosen (Technical University of Denmark, DK) ? Full-scale design and implementation of the STAR technology at a coal tar-impacted site Gavin Grant, Grant Scholes, David Major (Savron, CA), Len de Vlaming, Marlaina Auger (Geosyntec Consultants, CA) ? The fate of potentially toxic element co-contaminants during smouldering remediation Andrew Robson, Christine Switzer (University of Strathclyde, GB), David Kosson (Vanderbilt University, US) ? Electrokinetically enhanced remediation – An innovative solution for source area remediation Evan Cox, James Wang, Neal Durant (Geosyntec Consultants, US), David Reynolds (Geosyntec Consultants, CA), David Gent (US Army Corps of Engineers ERDC, US) Meeting Room 20 ThS 1C.2 Integrating sustainable remediation into other policies ? The regulatory basis for sustainable remediation practice in the European Union and United Kingdom Richard Bewley, Rick Parkman (URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited, GB), Paul Bardos (r3 environmental technology ltd, GB), Marcus van Zutphen (Shell Global Solutions International B.V., NL), Jonathan Smith (Shell Global Solutions UK Ltd, GB) ? Dutch remedial programme is heading for the finish: we're nearly done or not? Rachelle Verburg, Hans Slenders (ARCADIS, NL) ? Green management of former industrial decantation ponds Hermine Huot (Laboratoire Sols et Environnement / INRA-Université de Lorraine, FR), Patrick Charbonnier (Arcelor Mittal France, LU), Marie-Odile Simonnot (Université de Lorraine - CNRS, FR), Jean-Louis Morel (University of Lorraine, FR) ? Flanders integrates sustainable soil remediation into other policies Griet Van Gestel, Johan Ceenaeme, Ellen Luyten, Tim Caers, Bavo Peeters, Nick Bruneel (OVAM, BE) ? Building a network-based expert-stakeholder framework for sustainable remediation Filip Alexandrescu, Erika Rizzo, Lisa Pizzol, Andrea Critto (University Ca' Foscari, IT) Meeting Room 18 ThS 2.4 Redevelopment of brownfields 2 ? Towards 3D geochemistry of urban subsoil: historical and material inputs Cécile Le Guern, Vivien Baudouin, Pierre Conil (BRGM, FR) ? Transforming an area from brownfield to attractive city center – the Fredericia C project Christine Husum, Dorte Harrekilde (Ramboll, DK) ? What can you do for one and a half million – urban redevelopment through implementation of new technology Dennis Scheper, Gerard Borggreve, Albert Smits (NTP Enviro Netherlands, NL), Adri Nipshagen, Dick Specht (Bioclear, NL), Luuk Wallinga (RUD Drenthe, NL) 13  ? ? BALANCE 4P - A holistic approach for sustainable brownfield regeneration Jenny Norrman (Chalmers University of Technology, SE), Linda Maring (Deltares, NL), Fransje Hooimeijer (TUD, NL), Steven Broekx (Vito NV, BE), Yevheniya Volchko (Chalmers University of Technology, SE)   14  Explanation: Hall number Regular thematic session (ThS) or Special session (SpS) lecture title, presenter, co-authors, (institution, country) Meeting Room 19 ThS 1A.3 Novel monitoring approaches 1 ? Quantification of the groundwater-borne contaminant mass discharge to a stream using Point-Velocity Probes (PVP) Vinni K. Rønde, Ursula McKnight, Anne T. Sonne (Technical University of Denmark, DK), John Frederick Devlin (University of Kansas, US), Poul L. Bjerg (Technical Universty of Denmark, DK) ? A new, fast, clean and easy way to predict organic contaminant availability using thermodesorption – gas chromatography – mass spectrometry/flame ionization (Td-GC- MS/FID) Coralie Biache (LIEC UMR 7360 CNRS UL, FR), Catherine Lorgeoux (CNRS / Université de Lorraine, FR), Alain Saada, Stéfan Colombano (Brgm, FR), Pierre Faure (CNRS/Université de Lorraine, FR) ? CPT-based hydraulic profiling tool with extended capabilities in highly permeable media Eugen Martac, Axel Oppermann (Fugro Consult GmbH, DE) ? Development of an innovative technique for soil water sampling in unsaturated zones with highly variable water content Axel Fischer, Jens Fahl (TU Dresden, DE) ? Methodology for fast and reliable investigation and characterization of contaminated sites Jørgen Mølgaard Christensen (DGE Miljø og Ingeniørfirma, DK) Auditorium 10 ThS 1B.6 Environmental Risk Assessment - soil and groundwater 1 ? Approach to cumulative risk assessment of contaminated sites in Flanders Christa Cornelis, Lieve Geerts (VITO, BE), Griet Van Gestel (OVAM Public Waste Agency of Flanders, BE) ? A recommended approach to apply bioavailability methods in a framework for improved ecological risk assessments of PAH contaminated soils Dan Berggren Kleja, Anja Enell, Ann-Sofie Allard (Swedish Environmental Research Institute, SE), Staffan Lundstedt (Umeå University, SE), Gerard Cornelissen, Hans Peter Arp (Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, NO) ? Protocols for ecological risk assessment Marlea Wagelmans (Bioclear, NL) ? Risk assessment of urban gardening in Copenhagen Stefan Trapp (DTU, DK) ? Pyrite cinder waste deposition Scherpekamp Joop Verhagen, Denny Schanze (ARCADIS Nederland BV, NL)    Wednesday 10 June 09:00-10:30 15  Auditorium 11 ThS 1C.16 In Situ Chemical Oxidation (ISCO) 1 ? Destruction of perflourooctaine sulfonate (PFOS) and perflouroctanoic acid (PFOA) using activated persulfate Josephine Molin (PeroxyChem Environmental Technologies, US), Michael Mueller (PeroxyChem Environmental Technologies, AT), Brant Smith, Daniel Leigh (PeroxyChem Environmental Technologies, US) ? Sustained-release MultiOx technology: reactive synergies resulting from permanganate in combination with persulfate for passive contaminant treatment Lorenzo Sacchetti (Carus Europe, ES), Pamela Dugan (Carus Corporation, US) ? Use of different kinds of persulfate activation and Fenton Reagent for the removal of PFOA and PFOS from contaminated water Fernando Pardo, Virginia Huerta, Esperanza Montero, Sergio Rodríguez, Aurora Santos, Arturo Romero (University Complutense of Madrid, ES) ? Implementing in-situ chemical oxidation on an industrial EX-rated site Arno Kooistra, Art Lobs (Verhoeve Milieu & Water, NL), Tim De Bouw (RSK Benelux, BE), Richard Lookman (Verhoeve Groep Belgium bvba, BE) ? Remediation of a pentachlorophenol contamination underneath a residential area Tessa Pancras, Jurgen van der Wal, Joop Verhagen (ARCADIS Nederland B.V., NL) Auditorium 12 SpS 1D.1S Contaminated sites – evolution from the fumbling start to state of the art Organizers: Lone Tolstrup Karlby, Tage Vikjær Bote (Cowi, DK), Helle Okholm (Danish Environmental Protection Agency, DK), Christian Andersen (Danish Regions, DK), Torben Højbjerg Jørgensen (Cowi,DK), Nina Tuxen (Orbicon A/S, DK), Ninna Dahl Ravnsbæk (Cowi, DK) Moderators: Tage Vikjær Bote & Lone Tolstrup Karlby (COWI, DK) The legislators (Danish Environmental Protection Agency), the regulators (the Regional governments) and the performing part (consultants and contractors) in Danish soil and groundwater issues have a very unique working environment based on a strong scientific knowledge on all levels and very competent performers in the field. In the last three decades, Denmark has built a unique model for dealing with soil and groundwater contamination. The aim of the session is to inspire others by sharing the Danish approach of how to handle contaminated sites on all levels; our good and bad experiences on this topic, and with this, hopefully creating international working relations where we all share, learn and take home the best from each other´s practices. Program: ? Danish legislation of contaminated sites. The Legislation behind it all and how it has developed over the last 30 years. Helle Okholm/Ole Kiilerich (Danish Environmental Protection Agency, DK) ? How do the Danish Regions prioritize, investigate and remediate contaminated sites Christian Andersen (Danish Regions, Environment and Resource) ? Investigation and Remediation Methods, developments and state of the art Torben Højbjerg Jørgensen (COWI, DK) ? KRIPP: Concept for Risk based ranking and prioritization of contaminated sites. Nina Tuxen (Orbicon, DK) ? Brownfield Regeneration. How the Danish approach influences development of contaminated sites as old industrial areas, harbors and old marshalling yards and prevents that regeneration activities causes contamination to spread. Ninna Dahl Ravnsbæk (COWI, DK) Meeting Room 20 ThS 1C.3 Decentralization and harmonization ? Public funding scheme for remediation projects in Austria Regine Patek (KPC, AT) ? Harmonisation – bottom-up or top-down? – a national remediation framework for Australia Bruce Kennedy, Kerry Scott (CRC Care, Univ. of South Australia, AU), Ravi Naidu (CRC Care and CERAR, Univ. of South Australia, AU) ? Progress towards an ISO document on sustainable remediation C. Paul Nathanail (University of Nottingham, GB) ? Policy goals and experience of making of a national strategy for the remediation of 16  contaminated soil in Finland Sarianne Tikkanen (Finnish Environment Institute, FI), Anna-Maija Pajukallio (Ministry of the Environment, FI), Outi Pyy (Finnish Environment Institute, FI) ? Lake Boyuk Shor: environmental engineering and eco-hydrology as fast track to engineering solutions for lake restoration in Azerbaijan Bjent Enden (Witteveen+Bos, NL) Meeting Room 18 ThS 2.5 Reuse of contaminated soil and sediments 1 ? Urban geochemical backgrounds for excavated soil reuse Celine Blanc, Jean-Francois Brunet, Frédéric Guiet, Philippe Herniot, Aurelien Leynet (BRGM, FR), Hélène Roussel (ADEME, FR), Maxime Jarzabek (BRGM, FR) ? Contaminated sludge being used/reused in foundations of new projects Rob Wortelboer (TenCate Geosynthetics, NL) ? Flemish policy on the use of excavated soil Dirk Dedecker, Filip De Naeyer, Eddy Van Dyck (Public Waste Agency of Flanders, BE) ? LORVER: a production chain of biomass for industrial purposes from former sites and abandoned materials Marie-Odile Simonnot (Université de Lorraine - CNRS, FR), Sophie Guimont, Lucas Gossiaux (Valterra Dépollution Réhabilitation, FR), Jean-Louis Morel (University of Lorraine, FR) ? Geochemical fractionation and phytoavailability of trace elements in an estuarine soil impacted by historic mine waste contamination Eleanor van Veen, John Coggan (University of Exeter, GB) 17  Explanation: Hall number Regular thematic session (ThS) or Special session (SpS) lecture title, presenter, co-authors, (institution, country) Meeting Room 19 ThS 1A.4 Novel monitoring approaches 2 ? Use of next-generation characterization tools and three-dimensional visualization to enhance remedy performance Ian Ross (ARCADIS, GB), Mark Webb (ARCADIS EC Harris, GB) ? 3D-Modelling of the salt-/fresh water interface in coastal aquifers of Lower Saxony (Germany) based on airborne electromagnetic measurements (HEM) Nico Deus (State Authority for Mining, Energy and Geology, DE), Jörg Elbracht (LBEG Hannover, DE), Bernhard Siemon (Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources, DE) ? Innovative Field Investigations in Limestone using a FACT-FLUTe Klaus Mosthaf (DTU Environment, DK), Mie B. Sørensen (Capital Region of Denmark, DK), Mette Martina Broholm (Technical University of Denmark, DK), Henriette Kerrn- Jespersen (Capital Region of Denmark, DK), Philip J. Binning (Technical University of Denmark, DK) ? The Delft case – improved water and soil management through smart monitoring Rina Clemens (Witteveen+Bos, NL), Charon Walet (Municipality of Delft, NL), Hans Korving (Delft University of Technology, NL) ? Evidence of in situ biodegradation of ethyl tert-butyl ether (ETBE) in a fuel-contaminated aquifer using stable isotope tools Petra Bombach (Isodetect GmbH, DE), Norbert Nägele (Kuvier the Biotech Company S.L., ES), Mònica Rosell (Universitat de Barcelona - UB, ES), Hans Hermann Richnow (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, DE), Anko Fischer (Isodetect GmbH, DE) Auditorium 10 ThS 1B.7 Environmental Risk Assessment - soil and groundwater 2 ? Environmental risk assessment and remediation options for contaminated river sediments Michael Madliger, David Trudel, Christian Niederer (BMG Engineering AG, CH) ? Environmental risk assessment at large infrastructure projects: emissions from the use of explosives and construction chemicals Christian Niederer, Michael Madliger, Michael Aeschbacher (BMG Engineering AG, CH) ? Arsenic, antimony and selenium in urban soils: potential risks for human health in urban gardening Miguel Izquierdo, Eduardo De Miguel, Amaia Gomez, Juan Mingot (Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, ES) ? Gardening and soil contamination: finding a way to produce healthy home-grown food Griet Van Gestel, Nele Bal, Johan Ceenaeme (OVAM, BE), Karen Van Campenhout (LNE Environment, BE) Christa Cornelis (VITO, BE), Maja Mampaey (LNE Environment, BE) ? Residential location contaminated with cumene: building team construction results in a successful (in-situ) remediation Peter Ramakers (Provincie Brabant, NL), Joost van Schijndel (Tauw, NL), Gerard Borggreve (NTP Enviro Netherlands, NL) Wednesday 10 June 11:00-12:30 18  Auditorium 11 ThS 1C.11 Bioremediation of coal tar and fuels ? Simulation of bioremediation options by microbial degradation of aged PAH contamination in soils Arno Rein (Technische Universität München - TUM, DE), Stefan Trapp (Technical University of Denmark, DK), Iris K. U. Adam, Anja Miltner (Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, DE), Kilian Smith (Korean Institute of Science and Technology Europe, DE), Geoffrey Marchal (Technical University of Denmark, DK), Ulrich Gosewinkel (Aarhus University, DK), Philipp Mayer (Technical University of Denmark, DK), Matthias Kästner (Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, DE) ? Microbial key players during in-situ and in-vitro biostimulation of an ETBE polluted aquifer Marc Viñas, Miriam Guivernau (Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA), ES), Isabel Mori (Invesoil Consultores Medioambientales S.L., ES), Fernando García (Compañía Logística de Hidrocarburos, ES), Joaquim Vila (University of Barcelona, ES), Francesc X. Prenafeta-Boldú (Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology - IRTA, ES) ? Quinones increase availability of poorly soluble geogenic terminal electron acceptors for anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation Kerstin E. Scherr, Amandine de Schaetzen, Marion Hasinger-Sumetzberger, Diana Backes, Gertrud Kadlec (University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, AT), Andreas Loibner (BOKU, AT), Manfred Nahold (GUT Gruppe Umwelt + Technik GmbH, AT) ? Inoculated bioreactor for MTBE/TBA removal from water – lab & pilot tests Leen Bastiaens, Queenie Simons, Hans Sterckx, Guy Borgmans, Johan Gemoets (VITO nv, BE) ? Anaerobic bio-oxidation: a sustainable remedial technology for the treatment of BTEX Karen Van Geert, Jeroen Verhack, Wouter Gevaerts, Koen Enkels, Karolien Claeys, Gerlinde De Moor (ARCADIS Belgium, BE) Auditorium 12 ThS 1C.15 Combined treatment technologies 2 ? Cooperation of iron reducing bacteria and iron particles in remediation of chlorinated ethylenes Lenka Honetschlägerová, Petra Janouškovcová (Institute of chemical technology Prague, CZ) ? Lecithin and ferrous iron as electron donors for enhanced reduction dechlorination (ERD) and in situ chemical reduction (ISCR) Alan Seech (PeroxyChem Environmental Technologies, US), Michael Mueller (PeroxyChem Environmental Technologies, AT), Daniel Leigh (PeroxyChem Environmental Technologies, US) ? Accelerating trichloroethylene remediation in saprolite and fractured crystalline bedrock by in-situ chemical oxidation and in-situ chemical reduction - a successful case study of combined remedies at a challenging site George Y. Maalouf (Rogers & Callcott Environmental, US) ? Petroleum hydrocarbon mass removal using reagent based enhanced desorption combined with physical recovery techniques Jeremy Birnstingl (Regenesis, GB), Alberto Leombruni (Regenesis Ltd, IT), Ben Mork (Regenesis, US), Gareth Leonard (Regenesis, GB) ? Combined nano-biotechnology for in-situ remediation of mixed contamination of groundwater by hexavalent chromium and chlorinated solvents Jan Nemecek, Petr Pokorný (ENACON s.r.o., CZ), Ondrej Lhotský (Dekonta & Charles University, CZ), Petra Najmanová, Vladislav Knytl (DEKONTA a.s., CZ), Jana Steinová, Miroslav Cerník (Technical University of Liberec, CZ), Tomáš Cajthaml (Institute of Microbiology of the AS CR & Charles University, CZ)   19  Meeting Room 20 SpS 1C.5S Contaminated site remediation – practical decision making Organizer: John Hunt (Engineering Co, AU) This session focuses on how to make decisions regarding the remedial strategy for contaminated sites and associated information requirements above and beyond the assessment data required to implement a management or active remediation strategy. Australia has been developing national guidance on the remediation of contaminated sites; this involves consideration of how other countries approach the problem, and how concepts such as risk-based land management and sustainable remediation should be included. The concepts presented in this session should be of interest to many countries, particularly those that are grappling with how to achieve the greatest return from the investment in remediation of contaminated sites. The session includes speakers who are highly experienced in remediating contaminated sites and have a good understanding of international approaches being applied, and the thinking that underlies good decision making related to contaminated sites. Program: ? Setting the scene: commentary on the international approaches and new developments in remediation strategy Hans Slenders (ARCADIS, NL) ? Determining the most appropriate remediation strategy for a contaminated site Peter Nadebaum (GHD Pty Ltd, AU) ? Designing a remediation system – the solution is only as good as the problem definition John Hunt (Engineering Co, AU), Ian Brookman (Thiess Services Pty Ltd, AU) ? Risk Management Models for Remediation Projects – An Australian History, Ian Brookman (Thiess Services Pty Ltd, AU), John Hunt (Engineering Co, AU) Meeting Room 18 ThS 2.6 Reuse of contaminated soil and sediments 2 ? Using innovative geotextile constructions as an in-situ bioremediation technique to remediate contaminated sediments and to improve water quality of shallow lakes Chiel Lauwerijssen (Tauw Group, NL) ? Implementation of a Transit Hub Site (THS) for excavated soils – the Israeli experience Tomer Ash (LDD Advanced Technologies, IL), Meir Tapiero (BioSoil - Israel, IL), Raphi Mandelbaum (LDD Advanced Technologies, IL) ? Sustainable use of excavated soil in the Capital Region of Copenhagen - new initiatives Jens Lind Gregersen (Region Hovedstaden / Capital Region of Denmark, DK), Arne Rokkjær (Capital Region of Denmark, DK) ? Soil improvement with biochar - microcosms for characterization of the effects of biochar on acidic sandy soil Mónika Molnár, Viktoria Feigl, Éva Ujaczki, Orsolya Klebercz, Mária Tolner, Emese Vaszita, Katalin Gruiz (Budapest University of Technology and Economics, HU) ? The circular economy – maximising the reuse of soils – making it happen Claire Dickinson, Hilary Allen (Aecom, GB) 20  Explanation: Hall number Regular thematic session (ThS) or Special session (SpS) lecture title, presenter, co-authors, (institution, country) Meeting Room 19 SpS 1A.7S US EPA Session 1: Best Practices for Site Characterization Organizers: Carlos S. Pachon and Stephen A. Dyment (United States Environmental Protection Agency) A clear theme arising from EPA’s optimization studies is the need for more accurate characterization of site conditions to ensure remedy efficiency and success. The goal of the session is to share our lessons learned, discuss opportunities and challenges with professionals in the audience and to gain insights from the experiences of others. This session will present an overview of efforts to “optimize” site characterization, including leveraging the use of existing site data, the importance and application of a “life-cycle” Conceptual Site Model (CSM), the use of high resolution site characterization techniques to improve the design and implementation of groundwater remedies, the use of incremental sampling methodologies to improve the representativeness of characterization of soils, and the use of newer visualization tools to better plan and monitor site cleanup. Auditorium 10 SpS 1B.5S Vapor intrusion - state of the art Organizers: Tage Vikjær Bote, Per Loll (COWI, DK), Mads Georg Møller, Bjarke Neiegaard Hoffmark (Orbicon A/S, DK), Arne Rokkjær (Capital Region of Denmark, DK) Moderators: Per Loll (DMR, DK), Bjarke N. Hoffmar, (Orbicon, DK), Tage Vikjær Bote (COWI, DK) Since the mid 90's vapor intrusion has been a major issue in Denmark and today vapor intrusion is a significant part of the efforts to ensure against contaminated sites. Investigation techniques and approaches to locate and determine the amount of vapor intrusion has been developed over the last two decades. This has given us a knowledge and understanding of the mechanisms controlling the vapor intrusion, which are amongst the best in the world. Remediation techniques have been developed and refined to provide greater security against vapor intrusion due to this knowledge. Program: ? State of the art studies of vapor intrusions and migration pathways Per Loll (DMR, DK) ? Remediation techniques using passive venting systems Mads Georg Møller (Orbicon, DK) ? Monitoring strategy Tage V. Bote (COWI, DK) ? Remediation using Hybrid venting system based upon solar and wind power Bjarke N. Hoffmark (COWI A/S, DK) ? Remediation using Geo-membranes or other remediation techniques Arne Rokkjaer (Capital Region, DK) ? Lessons learned Per Loll (DMR, DK) Auditorium 11 ThS 1C.17 In Situ Chemical Oxidation (ISCO) 2 ? Combined Fenton-like oxidation and CO2 sparging for the treatment of groundwater contaminated by organic compounds Daniela Zingaretti, Iason Verginelli, Renato Baciocchi (University of Rome Tor Vergata, IT) Wednesday 10 June 14:00-15:30 21  ? Use of different kinds of persulfate activation with iron for the remediation of a PAH- contaminated soil Fernando Pardo (Universidad Complutense de Madrid, ES), Marina Peluffo (CINDEFI. AR), Aurora Santos, Arturo Romero (University Complutense of Madrid, ES) ? The advantage of bench scale treatability studies as a decision making tool for a full scale ISCO approach in an innovative tender procedure Albert Smits, Gerard Borggreve, Dennis Scheper (NTP Enviro, NL), Mart Jansen (Dutch Rail Soil Remediation Foundation, NL), Michael Mueller (PeroxyChem Environmental Technologies, AT) ? Barium ferrates for in-situ chemical oxidation of BTEX contaminants Norbert Klaas, Christine Herrmann, Karin Hauff (University of Stuttgart, DE) ? In-situ sodium persulfate oxidation of benzene under ambient (thermal) activation Ian Ross (ARCADIS, GB)   Meeting Room 20 SpS 1C.4S Practices in achieving sustainable remediation – avoiding greenwash by striving to demonstrate better results Organizers: Claudio Albano (CH2M Hill, IT), Laurent Bakker (Tauw bv, NL), Dietmar Müller- Grabherr (Environment Agency Austria / Common Forum on Contaminated Land, AT) Moderators: Dominique Darmendrail (BRGM / Common Forum on Contaminated Land, FR), Jonathan Smith (Shell Global Solutions / SuRF, UK) In London 2008 Soil and Groundwater Technology Association (SAGTA) in association with Network for Industrially Contaminated Land in Europe (NICOLE) held the first European conference raising the issue of sustainability in land remediation. Concurrently Sustainable Remediation Forum-UK (SuRF-UK) along with a NICOLE Working Group on Sustainable Remediation were established providing new forums to exchange information and innovating concepts. Now there are Sustainable Remediation Fora all around the world and international knowledge exchange is well established. Over the years these networks have strived to present case studies proving the advantages of sustainable remediation but have noticed many case studies of ‘greenwash’ instead. Decision making processes should be kept simple when possible and more complex if appropriate. All kinds of complex tools and methodologies are now being used although the reasoning to choose the most suitable sustainable solution is often obvious, primarily when proper stakeholder engagement is in place. Program: ? Introduction to the session ? Sustainable remediation, update on results and activities: - International cooperation Nicola Harries (CL:AIRE / SuRF International, UK) - US EPA Experiences Building Sustainability into Contaminated Site Programs Carlos Pachon (US EPA, US) - The NICOLE roadmap and European experiences Laurent Bakker (Tauw / NICOLE, NL) - Key findings of the 3rd Sustainable Remediation Conference at Ferrara, 2014 Claudio Albano (CH2MHILL / SuRF, IT) ? Discussion: International Fora and Programmes – Strengths and Weaknesses ? Sustainable remediation in Practice – No ‘claim’ – it’s proven Case studies USA, Australia, Europe ? Discussion: Decision making, complex or straightforward, results better or ‘greenwash’ Meeting Room 18 ThS 2.7 Reusing materials from mining activities and landfills ? Predicting plant metal bioaccessibility in soils contaminated by historic mining Eleanor van Veen, Bernd Lottermoser (University of Exeter, GB) ? Recycling nickel from hyperaccumulator plants at the pilot scale Marie-Odile Simonnot (Université de Lorraine - CNRS, FR), Vivian Houzelot, Xin Zhang (LRGP (CNRS - Université de Lorraine), FR), Florent Ferrari, Baptiste Laubie, Marie- Noëlle Pons (Université de Lorraine - CNRS, FR), Edouard Plasari (LRGP (CNRS - Université de Lorraine), FR), Aida Bani (Agricultural University of Tirana, AL), Jean-Louis Morel, Guillaume Echevarria (Université de Lorraine, FR) ? Insight into a 20 ha multi-contaminated brownfield megasite: an environmental forensics approach José Luis Rodríguez Gallego, Eduardo Rodríguez-Valdés, Noemi Esquinas, Alicia 22  Fernández-Braña, Nora Matanzas, Carlos Boente, Elías Afif (University of Oviedo, ES) ? Utilization of methane gas for electricity production on minor parts of closed landfills Tommy Bøg Nielsen, Stella Agger, Henrik Jannerup (Region Zealand, DK) ? Understanding Solid-gaseous Phase Transition of Elemental Contaminants during the Gasification of Biomass Harvested from Contaminated Land Ying Jiang, Phil Longhurst (Cranfield University, GB) 23  Explanation: Hall number Regular thematic session (ThS) or Special session (SpS) lecture title, presenter, co-authors, (institution, country) Meeting Room 19 ThS 1A.6 Adaptive monitoring based on real time data, model driven ? MIP-IN device for combined detection of pollutants and injection of reagents Leen Bastiaens (VITO NV, BE), Bjorn Anderson (Ejlskov, DK), Jan Kukacka (Dekonta, CZ), Jan De Vos (ABO, BE), Lars Nebel, Palle Ejlskov (Ejlskov, DK) ? Evolution of a site conceptual model using multimedia CSIA to supplement traditional techniques Devon Rowe, Carol Serlin, Seema Turner, Tom Chandler, Farshad Razmdjoo, Steve Luis (ENVIRON, US) ? Model of the influence of meanders and time varying stream levels on groundwater discharge to streams Nicola Balbarini, Ellen Nicolajsen, Vinni K. Rønde, Poul L. Bjerg, Philip J. Binning (Technical University of Denmark, DK) ? Integrated characterization of sediment quality in catchments/rivers Peter Grathwohl (University of Tübingen, DE), Hermann Rügner, Marc Schwientek (WESS c/o University of Tübingen, DE), Michael Rode (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research UFZ, DE) ? Occurrence of pharmaceuticals, hormones and perfluorinated compounds in groundwater in Taiwan Yen-Ching Lin (National Taiwan University, TW) Auditorium 10 ThS 1B.8 Indoor air pollution from soil and groundwater ? Probabilistic risk assessment for six vapour intrusion algorithms Jeroen Provoost (FI), Jan Bronders, Ilse Van Keer (Vito NV, BE) ? Origin of hydrocarbons in indoor air Dorte Harrekilde (Ramboll, DK), Niels Just (The Region of Southern Denmark, DK) ? Simple approach for the calculation of degradation of vinylchloride in the unsaturated zone in the VOLASOIL indoor exposure model Arjen Wintersen, Johannes P.A. Lijzen (National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, NL) ? Sewer systems as a major intrusion pathway for VOC’s to indoor air Karin Birn Nielsen, Børge Hvidberg (Central Denmark Region, DK) ? Blower door test to examine if VOC contamination in indoor air is caused by internal source or by sub-slab source Boerge Hvidberg, Karin Birn Nielsen (Central Denmark Region, DK) Auditorium 11 ThS 1C.22 Zero valent iron ? Implementation of zerovalent iron for source zone treatment via soil mixing Hilde Decuyper (A+E Consult bvba, BE), Nele Vermeiren (Smet F&C, BE), Johan Gemoets, Richard Lookman, Ilse Van Keer, Leen Bastiaens (VITO NV, BE) ? In situ remediation of chlorinated solvents using ZVI-clay soil mixing for the first time in Sweden Nicklas Larsson (NIRAS, SE), Anders Christensen (NIRAS, DK), Ulf Winnberg (Geological Survey of Sweden, SE), Henrik E. Steffensen (NIRAS, DK) ? Batchtests and field application of in situ remediation of groundwater contaminated with chlorinated solvents by direct injection of nanoscale Zero Valent Iron on three locations in Denmark Anne Gammeltoft Hindrichsen, John Ulrik Bastrup (Geo, DK) ? DNAPL source zone treatment with ZVI soil mixing Denny Schanze (ARCADIS Nederland BV, NL) Wednesday 10 June 16:00-17:30 24  ? Optimizing the properties of nanofluids for the efficient NAPL remediation in porous media Christos Tsakiroglou, Katerina Terzi, Alexandra Sikinioti-Lock, Kata Hajdu, Christos Aggelopoulos (Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, GR) Auditorium 12 ThS 1C.19 Miscellaneous remediation topics 2 ? Composting for ex situ/on site decontamination of PAHs contaminated soils Ondrej Lhotský (Dekonta & Charles University, CZ), Stefano Covino (Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ), Jana Janochová (Institute of Microbiology of the AS CR, CZ), Monika Stavelová (Aecom CZ, CZ), Petra Najmanová (DEKONTA, a.s., CZ), Tomáš Cajthaml (Institute of Microbiology of the AS CR & Charles University, CZ) ? Environmental dredging of a chromium contaminated fjord in Valdemarsvik, Sweden Stany Pensaert (DEC, BE) ? Acidic soil washing as a remediation method for Cu polluted soil: optimization of the leaching process and assessment of the solid residues Karin Karlfeldt Fedje, Ann-Margret Strömvall (Chalmers University of Technology, SE) ? Supercritical extraction coupled with ultrasounds for removal of pesticides from soil Teresa Castelo-Grande (FEUP, PT) ? High Resolution Groundwater Flow diagnostic system for optimization of in-situ site remediation and environmental protection Petr Kvapil, Martin Procházka, Tomáš Lederer (AQUATEST a.s., CZ) Meeting Room 20 ThS 1D.3 Risk mitigation and intervention measures ? Can we trust in Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR) to deal with emerging contaminants present in reclaimed water? Marta Hernández García (CETAQUA, ES), Oriol Gibert (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, ES), Xavier Bernat (CETaqua, ES), Karsten Nödler, Tobias Licha (Geoscience Centre of the University of Göttingen, DE) ? Biological treatment of micropollutants in drinking water resources Janneke Wittebol, Marlea Wagelmans (Bioclear, NL) ? How to get a camel to go through the eye of a needle: Successful site remediation of a former explosives production site: safe housing, working and drinking water production on a long-term basis Christian Weingran (HIM GmbH, DE), H. Georg Meiners (ahu AG Wasser·Boden·Geomatik, DE) ? PFCs in the United States: historical use, environmental occurrence, policy, and regulation Neal Durant (Geosyntec Consultants, US), Ramona Darlington (Battelle Memorial Institute, US) ? Bottom-up regional initiatives to tighten up the generic pesticides rules and regulations in the Netherlands Cors van den Brink (Royal HaskoningDHV, NL) Meeting Room 18 ThS 3.5 Ecosystems services and combined approaches ? Challenges and possibilites in the Danish groundwater sector Rolf Johnsen (Central Denmark Region, DK) ? Ecosystem services of the groundwater and the subsurface; filling the knowledge gap Johannes P.A. Lijzen (National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, NL), Sophie Vermooten (Deltares, NL), Hans Peter Broers (TNO, NL), Suzanne van der Meulen (Deltares, NL), Michiel Rutgers (RIVM, NL) ? Soil and groundwater related ecosystem services in the Atlas Natural Capital Suzanne van der Meulen (Deltares, NL), Kees Hendriks (Alterra, Wageningen University and Research Centre, NL), Michiel Rutgers (RIVM, NL) ? Application of Life Cycle Assessment into development of urban projects Jordi Boronat (MediTerra, ES), Geertrui Louwagie (European Environment Agency, DK), Carmen Hidalgo (leitat, ES), Paul Nathanail (Land Quality Management Ltd, GB), Karen Van Geert (ARCADIS Belgium, BE), Nila Nielsen (AECAS - MediTerra, ES) ? Management of the subsurface: an EIA for a National spatial plan for the subsurface Justine Oomes (Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment, NL), Matthijs Nijboer (Tauw 25  bv, NL), Ivo van der Sommen, Anita Bijvoet (Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment, NL) 26  Explanation: Hall number Regular thematic session (ThS) or Special session (SpS) lecture title, presenter, co-authors, (institution, country) Meeting Room 19 ThS 4.1 Adaptive water quantity and quality management in urban areas ? Impacts from climate changes on contaminated soil and ground water – are we sufficiently aware of them? Stella Agger, Tommy Bøg Nielsen, Hanne Møller Jensen (Region Zealand, DK) ? The quality of stormwater runoff leaving filter soil Karin Cederkvist, Peter E. Holm, Marina B. Jensen (University of Copenhagen, DK) ? The role of the utility company in relation to rain water management in the case of climate changes with increased amounts of precipitation. Charlotte Schow Jensen (Rambøll, DK) ? The risk of mobilizing contaminants from soil when infiltrating rain water. Britt Boye Thrane (Rambøll, DK) ? Reactive transport impacts on recovered water quality for a field MPPW-ASR system in a geochemically heterogeneous coastal aquifer Koen Zuurbier, Niels Hartog, Pieter Niels Stuyfzand (KWR Watercycle Research Institute, NL) Auditorium 10 SpS 1B.3S After 25 years of contaminated land-related human exposure models: READY, STEADY, GO? Organizers: Frank Swartjes (National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, NL), Yvonne Ohlsson (Swedish Geotechnical Institute, SE), Renato Baciocchi, Iason Verginelli (University of Rome Tor Vergata, IT), Stefan Trapp (Technical University of Denmark, DK), Roberto Pecoraro (Versalis, IT), Jeroen Provoost (FI) Moderator: Frank Swartjes (National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, NL) 25 Years ago the first generation of human exposure models was published. Today, human exposure models are widely available and worldwide used on a large scale, often without much review or criticism. In many contaminated soil and groundwater appraisals, however, human exposure models contribute significantly to good risk assessment and risk management practices. More than that, human exposure models often are considered as the core tool in risk assessment and risk management of contaminated soil and groundwater. Therefore, the question is warranted after 25 years if human exposure models are ‘finished’ or if serious knowledge gaps remain. Moreover, an interesting question is how human exposure models are used in practical applications. Program: ? Setting the scene Frank Swartjes (National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, NL) ? Oral bioavailability after soil ingestion Joanna Wragg, Mark Cave (British Geological Survey, UK) ? Test and calibration of a standard plant organic contaminants uptake model Stefan Trapp (Technical University of Denmark, DK) ? Integration of modelling and field data in the vapour inhalation pathway Renato Baciocchi, Iason Verginelli (University of Rome Tor Vergata, IT), Roberto Pecoraro (Versalis, IT) ? Vapour intrusion modelling - crystal ball or crystal clear? Jeroen Provoost (FI) ? Misunderstandings or misuses in practical applications Yvonne Ohlsson (Swedish Geotechnical Institute, SE) Thursday 11 June 09:00-10:30 27  Auditorium 11 SpS 1C.23S Nanoremediation 1- all you wanted to know (a practical guide to nanoremediation) – Organizers: Paul Bardos (r3 environmental technology ltd, GB), Juergen Braun (University of Stuttgart, DE), Miroslav Cerník (Technical University of Liberec, CZ), Dan Elliott (Geosyntec Consultants, US), Elsa Limasset (BRGM, FR), Hans-Peter Koschitzky (University of Stuttgart, DE) Moderator: Paul Bardos (r3 environmental technology ltd, UK) Part I of the Nanoremediation session focuses on providing a practical grounding in nanoremediation theory and practice with particular reference to applied examples in the field. Part II of the session focuses on providing business and strategic intelligence for delegates with interests in utilizing or developing nanoremediation activities within their organisations or at client sites. (Part II is scheduled on 11 June 2014 at 11:00 hrs in Auditorium 11.) Nanotechnologies could offer a step-change in remediation capabilities: treating persistent contaminants which have limited remediation alternatives. In 2007 in Europe it was forecast that the 2010 world market for environmental nanotechnologies would be around $6 billion (JRC Ispra 2007). In fact, adoption of nanoremediation has been much slower. However, the recent emergence of nanoremediation as a commercially-deployed remediation technology in several EU countries indicates that it is timely to reconsider its potential applications and the consequent implications for their business activities. Since early 2014, the EU FP7 NanoRem project (www.nanorem.eu) has been carrying out an intensive development and optimisation programme for different nanoparticles (NPs), along with analysis and testing methods, investigations of fate and transport of the NPs and their environmental impact. NanoRem is a €14 million international collaborative project with 28 Partners from 12 EU countries, and linkages to the USA and Asia. It is a major initiative, which will support the effective deployment of nanoremediation technologies in Europe. Program: ? What nano-remediation is and what it can and cannot do Miroslav Cerník (Technical University Liberec, Czech Republic) ? Practical experience in nanoremediation Dan Elliott (Geosyntec Consultants, USA) ? Regulatory perspective on nanoremediation use Elsa Limasset (BRGM, France) ? The NanoRem experience: large scale and case study testing Jürgen Braun (University of Stuttgart, Germany) ? Questions and answers Meeting Room 20 SpS 1C.6S Sustainability in contaminated site management – case Finland Organizers: Jaana Sorvari (Aalto University, FI), Seppo Nikunen (Pöyry Finland Oy, FI), Jussi Reinikainen, Outi Pyy (Finnish Environment Institute, FI), Anna-Maija Pajukallio (Ministry of the Environment, FI) Moderator: Jaana Sorvari (Aalto University, FI) In Finland, the number of potentially contaminated sites, recorded in the national database known as MATTI, currently totals some 25,000. Most of these sites have not yet been investigated but it has been estimated that 11,000 sites need to be remediated in the future. The estimated cost of these activities is 4 billion euros. At the same time, state funding is scarce and covers roughly only 5-10% of the total costs. Hence, in most cases the costs of remediation need to be paid by private problem owners. This is a challenge from the viewpoint of the realization of sustainable contaminated site management (CSM) since no incentives actually exist to consider all components of sustainability in decision making. The session aims to present how Finland has tried to solve the problem of the implementation of sustainability principle in CSM, when both the economic and human resources are scarce, market is limited and the practical issues such as logistics and lack of guidelines create barriers to it. 28  Program: ? Introduction Jaana Sorvari (Aalto University, FI) ? National remediation strategy and renewing of the state funding system Anna-Maija Pajukallio (Ministry of the Environment, FI) ? New guidelines to implement sustainability principle in CSM Jussi Reinikainen (Finnish Environment Institute, FI) ? Experiences of the use of in situ techniques vs. traditional dig and dump Seppo Nikunen (Pöyry Finland Oy, FI) ? A case study on addressing soil contamination in an expanding city during and by means of the planning of new areas Kaarina Laakso (City of Helsinki, FI) ? Panel discussion Meeting Room 18 SpS 3.1S Challenges for application of Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage in Europe Organizers: Martin Bloemendal (Delft University of Technology, NL), Frans van de Ven (Delft University of Technology / Deltares, NL), Nanne Hoekstra (Deltares, NL) Moderator: Ruud Cino (Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment, NL In Climate KIC E-use, groundreach and geopower projects several barriers were identified for ATES development in different European countries. Distinction was made between immature and mature market problems and general barriers. Research is ongoing to solve the identified barriers. Which barriers are most important, which research is needed to solve these barriers, and if not already lined-up, how can we address the questions at hand? Program: ? Barrier identification and ATES research Nanne Hoekstra (Deltares, NL) ? Functioning of ATES systems in practice / Building (control) system Stefan Kranz (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, DE) ? Effect of heterogeneity on temperature distribution in ATES wells Wijb Sommer (Wageningen University and Research centre, NL) ? Unfamiliarity with potential ATES suitability/potential in world Martin Bloemendal (Delft University of Technology / KWR Water cycle research institute NL) ? Pitches on projects dealing with identified barriers and discussion: - Swimming pool Alzamora Spain with new type geoexchanger; legislation barrier Julián Rodríguez, (Itecon, ES) - Nike distribution centre. Barrier high investment, uncertainty on performance Wouter Gevaerts (ARCADIS, BE) - A project from Italy or Germany speaker to be defined ? Discussion ? Wrap-up; which questions are most important, how can we address them? 29  Explanation: Hall number Regular thematic session (ThS) or Special session (SpS) lecture title, presenter, co-authors, (institution, country) Meeting Room 19 SpS 4.2S Artificial recharge of coastal aquifers Organizers: Koen Zuurbier (KWR Watercycle Research Institute, NL), Gualbert H.P. Oude Essink (Deltares / Utrecht University, NL), Niels Hartog (KWR Watercycle Research Institute / Utrecht University, NL) Moderator: Niels Hartog (KWR Watercycle Research Institute / Utrecht University, NL) Local, small-scale managed aquifer recharge (MAR) may provide site-tailored freshwater management solutions in coastal areas that are increasingly under pressure through both population growth and climate change. These solutions may provide flexible solutions world- wide for varying conditions, such as more extreme water events (drought and pluvial flooding). The local MAR-solutions demonstrate robust solutions for freshwater management by exploiting temporal natural freshwater sources (rainwater, surface water, drainage water, waste water) for abstraction upon storage in times of demand for irrigation, industrial, and drinking water purposes. Through the analysis of various field cases it can be demonstrated how to deal with different geological settings, application in brackish/saline groundwater, water quality changes and pre-treatment preceding injection. Program: ? An introduction to the rise of MAR for local freshwater management in the Netherlands Carl Paauwe (Waterbuffer foundation, NL) ? The use of sophisticated well configuration to enable freshwater aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) in coastal aquifers Koen Zuurbier (KWR Watercycle Research Institute, NL) ? Potential for removal of pathogens during aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) in an agricultural setting for self-sufficiency of freshwater Jouke Velstra (Acacia Water, NL) ? Large scale application of small scale managed aquifer recharge (MAR) systems in the saline coastal delta of Bangladesh Boris van Breukelen (VU University Amsterdam, NL) ? On promising techniques for local fresh groundwater supply in the Southwestern Delta, The Netherlands: GO-FRESH Gualbert Oude Essink (Deltares / Utrecht University, NL) ? MAR as a solution for freshwater management on a small Danish island (Falster) Klaus Hinsby (GEUS, DK) ? Discussion ? Wrap-up; which are the important research questions, directions for the future, challenges and how can we address them? Auditorium 10 SpS 1B.4S TRIAD investigations of soil and groundwater contamination – experiences and future possibilities, pros and cons Organizers: Dorte Harrekilde (Ramboll, DK), Anna Toft, Peter Lysholm Tüchsen (The Capital Region of Denmark, DK) Moderator: Dorte Harrekilde (Ramboll, DK) The use of the TRIAD approach to investigate contaminated sites has increased over the past years in Europe. The TRIAD approach aims at achieving a greater sample density and real- time analyses with systematic planning and dynamic work strategies. One of the overall objectives is to minimize the number of field campaigns and to reduce nuisances for the property owner by assuring more rapid investigations. Thursday 11 June 11:00-12:30 30  During this session experiences with the TRIAD approach will be presented and discussed. Further on the program: pros and cons for using TRIAD, challenges, contaminants that are most suitable for TRIAD investigations, constraints in suitability depending on the type of investigation to be carried out i.e. when is the TRIAD approach suitable for delineating a groundwater plume, for carrying out initial soil investigations or for more complex investigations, quality of TRIAD investigations compared to traditional investigations, use of elements of the TRIAD approach in traditional investigations. Auditorium 11 SpS 1C.24S Nanoremediation part 2 - your future business opportunities (strategic and market intelligence) – Organizers: Paul Bardos (r3 environmental technology ltd, GB), Stephan Bartke (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, DE), Nicola Harries (CL:AIRE, GB), Hans-Peter Koschitzky (University of Stuttgart, DE) Moderator: Nicola Harries (CL:AIRE, GB) Part II of the Nanoremediation session focuses on providing business and strategic intelligence for delegates with interests in utilizing or developing nanoremediation activities within their organisations or at client sites. (Part I of the session is scheduled on 11 June, from 9:00-10.30 hrs – Auditorium 11, and provides a practical grounding in nanoremediation theory and practice.) Nanotechnologies could offer a step-change in remediation capabilities: treating persistent contaminants which have limited remediation alternatives. In 2007 in Europe it was forecast that the 2010 world market for environmental nanotechnologies would be around $6 billion (JRC Ispra 2007). In fact, adoption of nanoremediation has been much slower. However, the recent emergence of nanoremediation as a commercially-deployed remediation technology in several EU countries indicates that it is timely to reconsider its potential applications and the consequent implications for their business activities. Since early 2014, the EU FP7 NanoRem project (www.nanorem.eu) has been carrying out an intensive development and optimisation programme for different nanoparticles (NPs), along with analysis and testing methods, investigations of fate and transport of the NPs and their environmental impact. NanoRem is a €14 million international collaborative project with 28 Partners from 12 EU countries, and linkages to the USA and Asia. It is a major initiative, which will support the effective deployment of nanoremediation technologies in Europe. Program: ? Preliminary scenarios for the EU nanoremediation market in 2025 – assessment of market drivers (opportunities and challenges) affecting the take-up of nanoremediation Stephan Bartke (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, DE) ? Discussion in groups about market prospects and drivers ? Plenary reporting back of discussion groups Auditorium 12 ThS 1C.12 In situ remediation technologies 1 ? An innovation to increase rate and performance of in situ bioremediation – development of a new technology Jeremy Birnstingl (Regenesis, GB), Ben Mork (Regenesis, US) ? In-situ zinc bioprecipitation through organic substrate injection in a high-flow aquifer: from laboratory to full-scale Mattias Verbeeck (Antea Group, BE), Richard Lookman, Johan Gemoets (VITO nv, BE), Beatrijs Lambié (Antea Group, BE) ? In situ biological treatment of nitrate-polluted groundwater for drinking water production Irene Jubany, Montserrat Calderer (Fundació CTM Centre Tecnològic, ES), Ester Vilanova, Jordi Font-Capo, Jorge Molinero (Amphos 21 Consulting S.L, ES), Roser Grau, Esteve Pintó (Catalana de Perforacions, P.I. Sta Anna, 4.2, 08251 Santpedor, ES) ? Full-scale electrokinetics-enhanced bioremediation (EK-BIO) of PCE DNAPL source area in clay till Charlotte Riis, Martin Bymose, Dorte Pade (Niras A/S, DK), Evan Cox, James Wang (Geosyntec Consultants, US), David Gent (US Army Corps of Engineers ERDC, US), Mads Terkelsen (Capital Region, DK) 31  ? Predicting tools for an optimal in situ bioremediation strategy in a hydrocarbons contaminated rail yard site Laura Tiano, Jørgen Mølgaard Christensen (Biorem Aps, DK), Beate Müller (DB Netz AG, DE), Michael Petzold (DB AG, DE) Meeting Room 20 ThS 1C.7 Strategies for remediation and brownfield regeneration ? Regeneration of brownfield mega-sites – a review of existing and emerging technologies and their application for a test-site Lauge Clausen (Technical University of Denmark, DK) ? Pollution of soil and groundwater by industrial oils dumping in Jarama River Basin (Madrid, Spain) Fermín Villarroya, Esperanza Montero, Juan Pedro Martín (Universidad Complutense de Madrid, ES) ? Lac Megantic: The rehabilitation of a town following a petroleum loaded train explosion Michel Beaulieu (MDDELCC, CA) ? Remediation in China John Ulrik Bastrup (Geo, DK), Jie Cheng (Dongzhimen Nandajie, CN), Daniel Chiang (Wuxi Taihu Lake Restoration Co., CN) ? Combined remedy synergies – examples and conceptual road map Jeremy Birnstingl (Regenesis, GB) Meeting Room 18 SpS 3.3S Unforeseen events in management of the subsurface: learning practice Organizers: Jasper Lackin (Witteveen+Bos, NL), Justine Oomes (Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment, NL), Roelof Stuurman (Deltares, NL),. Jaap Tuinstra (Dutch Soil Protection Technical Committee TCB, NL), Timo Heimovaara (TU Delft, NL; to be confirmed) Moderator: Justine Oomes (Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment, NL) In order to realize our ambition on climate, energy and a comfortable living environment the subsurface will be used more intensively in the near future. Rapid innovations and economic circumstances give the opportunity to increase our use of the subsurface. This increase in multiple uses creates a pressure on the subsurface which needs to be managed. Unforeseen events occur in every-day projects and can have negative social, cost or environmental impacts and limit other uses in the subsurface. This was the reason for a preliminary Dutch study and recent publication „Unexpected events in the subsurface“ (TCB, Witteveen+Bos and Deltares). This study implies a broad analysis of causes and consequences combined with lessons learned from illustrated cases. It resulted in insights with respect to the negative impact of unforeseen events and the factors that play an important role in occurrence and prevention. Looking at traditional tendering (knowledge sharing, risk evaluation and liability) and High Reliable Organizations helps us to find possible solutions to manage unforeseen events. The preliminary study has shown that knowledge availability and sharing, risk sharing during tendering, transparency and attitude toward unforeseen events and good governance play an important role in enhancing our grip on unforeseen events. The session organizers wish to enrich the Dutch experiences and lessons learned with experiences of professionals from other countries represented on AquaConsoil. Program: ? Unforeseen events in the subsurface: a problem? Jaap Tuinstra (Dutch Soil Protection Technical Committee, NL) ? Delflandse kust - Building with Nature, flooding due to dike remediation Roelof Stuurman (Deltares, NL) ? Gertsewoud, wrong use of slag after bursting soils Jasper Lackin (Witteveen+Bos, NL) ? How to predict long term effects Timo Heimovaara (TU Delft, The Netherlands) to be confirmed ? Two extra pitches representing practice with unforeseen events in other countries ? Discussion in subgroups around cases presented in the pitches, on possible solutions and approaches to anticipate ? Plenary discussion on the main results from the subgroups ? Conclusions, wrap-up 32  Explanation: Hall number Regular thematic session (ThS) or Special session (SpS) lecture title, presenter, co-authors, (institution, country) Meeting Room 19 ThS 1A.5 Persistence of historical and emerging subsurface contaminants ? Hydrocarbons bioavailability change during bioremediation and its implication for risk assessment Frederic Coulon (Cranfield University, GB), Guozhong Wu (Tsinghua University, CN), Cedric Kechavarzi (University of Cambridge, GB), Ruben Sakrabani, Amii Whelan (Cranfield University, GB) ? Can aged spiked soils reflect bioaccessibility of native PAHs in historically contaminated soils? Andreas Loibner (BOKU, AT), Kerstin E. Scherr (University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, AT), Eva Edelmann, Stefan Humel, Dietmar Kopp (BOKU, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, AT), Philipp Mayer (Technical University of Denmark, DK) ? Remediation of polycyclic aromatic compounds contaminated soils by chemical oxidation and bioremediation: consequences on polar PAC (degradation, formation and mobility) Sitraka Andriatsihoarana, Marine Boulangé, Salma Ouali (Université de Lorraine, FR), Catherine Lorgeoux (CNRS / Université de Lorraine, FR), Délphine Catteloin, Ogier Hanser (Université de Lorraine, FR), Aurélie Cebron (CNRS / Université de Lorraine, FR), Stéfan Colombano, Alain Saada (Brgm, FR), Pierre Faure (CNRS/Université de Lorraine, FR) ? Characterization of dozens of sites around the globe impacted by perfluorinated compounds: common encounters and lessons learned Dave Woodward (AECOM, US), Rachael Casson (AECOM, AU), Dora Chiang (AECOM, DE) ? Screening for fluorinated compounds (PFAS) around potential sources of pollution at Danish defence establishments Jacqueline Anne Falkenberg (NIRAS, DK), Mette Marie Mygind, Anne Mette Bräuner Lindof (Ministry of Defence, DK), Jette Kjøge Olsen, Jens Dengsø Jensen, Anders Christensen (NIRAS, DK) Auditorium 10 SpS 1C.28S European advances in nanoremediation technology ? In-situ Groundwater Remediation Using Carbo-Iron®: Large Scale Flume Experiment to Investigate Transport and Reactivity in a source-treatment approach Kumiko Miyajima (University of Stuttgart, DE), Katrin Mackenzie (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, DE), Juergen Braun (University of Stuttgart, DE) ? Reactivity tests in columns for simulating source zone and plume remediation of chlorinated hydrocarbons by zero-valent metal particles under subsurface-like conditions Christine Herrmann, Maurice Menadier, Norbert Klaas (University of Stuttgart,DE) ? Agar agar stabilized milled zerovalent iron particles for in situ groundwater remediation Milica Velimirovic, Doris Schmid, Stephan Wagner, Vesna Micic Batka, Frank von der Kammer, Thilo Hofmann (University of Vienna, AT) ? Demonstrating Nanoremediation in the Field - The NanoRem Test Sites Juergen Braun (University of Stuttgart, DE), Randi Bitsch (Solvay AG, SE), Matthias Kraatz (Golder Associates GmbH, DE), Jorge Gonçalves (Geoplano-Consultores, S.A, PT), Nerea Otaegi (Tecnalia Research & Innovation, Geldo, ES), Noam Weisbrod (Zuckerberg Institute for Water Research, Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, IL), Petr Kvapil (AQUATEST a.s., CZ) Thursday 11 June 14:00-15:30 33   ? Performance of Carbo-Iron particles in in-situ groundwater plume and source treatment approaches Katrin Mackenzie, Steffen Bleyl, Frank-Dieter Kopinke (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, DE) ? Nanoiron and Carbo-Iron® particle transport in aquifer sediments - Targeted deposition Steffen Bleyl, Katrin Mackenzie, Anett Georgi, Frank-Dieter Kopinke (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, DE) Auditorium 11 ThS 1C.26 Thermal remediation 1 ? How Effective is Thermal Remediation of DNAPL Source Zones in Reducing Groundwater Concentrations? Ralph Baker, Gorm Heron, Steffen Griepke Nielsen (TerraTherm, Inc., US), Niels Ploug (Krüger A/S, DK) ? Indoor thermal remediation in an old industrial area in the capital region of Denmark Katerina Hantzi, Ida Damgaard (Capital Region of Denmark, DK), Jes Holm (Geo, DK), Pernille Kjærsgaard (Orbicon A/S, DK) ? Mixture of high and low boiling compounds in a mixed low and high permeable setting – Thermal design considerations Jesper Holm, Niels Ploug, Max Jensen (Krüger A/S, DK), Steffen Griepke Nielsen, Gorm Heron (TerraTherm, US) ? Experiences using Gas Thermal Remediation (GTR) in Denmark Jacob H. Christiansen (COWI Denmark, DK) ? In-situ thermal remediation of CVOCs from source zone containing chlorinated solvents and motor oil as NAPL Carol Winell, Cavis Carpenter, Grant Geckeler (Good Earthkeeping Organization Inc., US)  Auditorium 12 SpS 1C.29S Varying national approaches to contaminated site management – what can we learn from our neighboring countries? Organizers: Danish Knowledge Exchange Group Four consultants of different nationalities will be invited to give a description of a contaminated site, and asked to prepare a presentation of how they would tackle this case in their country. The session aims to show both differences and similarities in our approaches across national borders – and to inspire us to collaborate with and learn from our European neighbors. The case descriptions will contain information about required regulatory approvals/permits, the necessary extent of investigations (and remediation) to understand and risk assess the site, methods for investigation (and remediation) of the site and stakeholders. Program: ? Introduction (10 min) ? Danish case solution (15 min) ? UK case solution (15 min) ? FR/IT/ES case solution (15 min) ? Eastern European/US case solution (15 min) ? Panel/plenum discussion (20 min) Polling equipment will be available to the audience during this session. Polling questions will be asked during the individual presentations and especially during the panel discussion. Results will appear on-screen immediately and be an integral part of the discussions. Meeting Room 20 ThS 1C.8 Uncertainty in remediation ? Tools for the Calculation of Remediation Times Thomas Held (ARCADIS Deutschland GmbH, DE) 34  ? Analysis of remediation studies to assess the major factors influencing remediation efficiency Florian Cazals (INNOVASOL, FR), Olivier Atteia (EA 4592 G&E, ENSEGID, University of Bordeaux, FR) ? Estimation of remediation rates for chlorinated solvents in confined unsaturated media Gro Lilbaek, Jacqueline Anne Falkenberg, Anders Christensen (NIRAS, DK), Helle Overgaard (The Capital Region of Denmark, DK) ? The use of smart DPE and real time data for maximising the return of investmaent in contaminated land remediation Anil Waduge (ARCADIS, GB) ? Strategic management of uncertainties of remediation costs by identification of critical parameters and sensitivity analysis on costs: methodology and case studies Karen Van Geert, Wouter Gevaerts, Gerlinde De Moor, Anja Vandercappellen (ARCADIS Belgium, BE) Meeting Room 18 ThS 3.4 Subsurface planning and management ? Improved recirculation system to treat a chlorinated solvent contamination and to allow for heat recuperation Karen van Geert, Isabelle Olivier, Wouter Gevaerts, Jeroen Verhack, Thomas van Humbeeck (ARCADIS Belgium, BE) ? Understanding the environmental risks associated with shale gas development in the UK George Prpich, Frederic Coulon, Gill Drew, Simon Pollard, Ben Anthony (Cranfield University, GB) ? Aquifer Thermal Energy Systems in areas of drinking water and groundwater pollutions Lars Jacobsen, Jesper Furdal, John Ulrik Bastrup (Geo, DK) ? Shallow groundwater in NW Italy and perspectives for geothermal purposes Arianna Bucci, Domenico Antonio De Luca, Manuela Lasagna (University of Turin, IT) ? Let’s make groundwater STRONGer – A watersystem-based approach towards 3D spatial development Reinier Romijn (Dutch Water Authorities, NL), Almer Bolman (Dutch Water Authorities / WS Vallei & Veluwe, NL)    35  Explanation: Hall number Regular thematic session (ThS) or Special session (SpS) lecture title, presenter, co-authors, (institution, country) Meeting Room 19 SpS 4.3S Climate robust water availability management for industry and agriculture Organizers: Hans van Duijne (Deltares/Wageningen University, NL) Moderator: Jan Vreeburg (Wageningen University, NL), together with PhD’s The availability of fresh water is under pressure in coastal and (semi-)arid regions due to climate change leading to extended drought periods, sea level rise, and due to increased water demands by industry, agriculture and domestic sectors. This session will debate new regional solutions for securing water availability and the need of cross sectorial cooperation between government, industry, agriculture, and scientists. Program: ? The global and local perspective and the role of green infrastructure and subsurface in fresh water supply in water scarce regions Huub Rijnaarts (Wageningen University, NL) ? Global change and the role of government: how to obtain more involvement of industry and research in solving local water availability and the sustainable use subsurface Ruud Cino (Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment, NL) ? Cooperation in water management between urban, rural and industrial stakeholders: from regional water management perspective to local implementation Representative of the Barcelona region, Spain ? The ambition of industry in sustainable use of resources including water and subsurface; tailoring industrial operations and regional settings towards self-sufficient water management Niels Groot / Heenk Pool (Dow Chemical/Dow Benelux, NL) ? Considering the influence of climatic uncertainty in designing measures to protect and restore critical water resources Scott Warner (ENVIRON International Corporation, US), Devon Rowe (ENVIRON, US); Gretchen Greene (ENVIRON International Corporation, US) Auditorium 10 ThS 1B.9 Risk modeling ? Assessment of risks due to the permeation of organic contaminants in groundwater through polyethylene drinking water pipes Piet Otte (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, NL), Martin Schans, Martin Meerkerk (KWR Watercycle Research Institute, NL), Frank Swartjes (National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, NL) ? Quantification of contaminant transport from sediment Paul Frogner-Kockum, Märta Ländell, Gunnel Göransson, Yvonne Ohlsson (Swedish Geotechnical Institute, SE) ? Assessing risk of contaminated soil with catchment area models – experiences and possibilities Bianca Pedersen (Ramboll Denmark, DK), Dorte Harrekilde, Lars Bennedsen (Rambøll, DK), Kristian Bitsch, Britt Boye Thrane (Ramboll Denmark, DK) ? Improvements with geostatistics for lithology representative fields and flow models at Sellafield site Jean-Marc Chautru, Claire Faucheux, Yvon Desnoyers (Geovariances, FR), Nick Jefferies, Peter Jackson (AMEC Foster Wheeler, GB), Ian Teasdale, Julian Cruickshank (Sellafield, GB) ? Matrix diffusion in groundwater aquifers Dave T. Adamson (GSI Environmental Inc., US), Henrik Engdal Steffensen (NIRAS A/S, DK), Charles J. Newell (GSI Environmental Inc., US), Niels D. Overheu, Mads Terkelsen, Thursday 11 June 16:00-17:30 36  Peder Johansen, Line Moerkebjerg Fischer (Capital Region, DK), Charlotte Riis, Anders Christensen (NIRAS, DK) Auditorium 11 ThS 1C.27 Thermal remediation 2 ? In-Situ Thermal Remediation of PCBs: Lessons Learned and Results from Treatability Study, Pilot Test and Full Scale Remediation Carol Winell, Xiaosong Chen (Good Earthkeeping Organization Inc., US) ? In-situ thermal remediation at a site with DNAPL in overburden above fractured rock Gorm Heron, Jim Galligan, Robin Swift (TerraTherm, US), Bruce Thompson, Jessie McCusker (demaximis, US), Michael Gefell, John LaChance (ARCADIS, US) ? Steam-air injection in fractured bedrock: results and lessons learned of a CHC- remediation at the site Biswurm (Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany) Oliver Trötschler, Hans-Peter Koschitzky (University of Stuttgart, VEGAS, DE), Bernd Lidola, Isabell Kleeberg (Stadtbauamt Villingen-Schwenningen, DE), Stefan Schulze (GEOsens, DE) ? Complex boundary conditions for in-situ thermal treatments (ISTT) conducted during land recycling and remediation beneath buildings Uwe Hiester, Martina Müller (reconsite GmbH, DE) ? Thermal treatment – challenges and solutions Steffen Griepke Nielsen, Gorm Heron, Ralph Baker (TerraTherm, Inc., US), Niels Ploug (Krüger A/S, DK) Auditorium 12 ThS 1C.13 In situ remediation technologies 2 ? Feasibility of bioscreens for regional VOC-plume in industrial-urban area Katrien Van De Wiele, Johan Ceenaeme (OVAM, BE) ? Aerobic bioremediation: new solutions and approaches for a consolidated technology Lorenzo Sacchetti (Carus Europe, ES) ? A combination of anaerobic and aerobic bioremediation to treat a complex mixture of contaminants at a landfill site John Dijk, Antonio Distante, Martin Slooijer (BioSoil International BV, NL), Giovanni Buscone, Laura Ledda (Tauw Italia S.r.I., IT) ? Field pilot test of in situ biostimulation and bioaugmentation of phenoxyacid pesticides as a remedy for a pesticide point source Katerina Tsitonaki, Sandra Roost, Kresten Andersen, Lars Christian Larsen, Nina Tuxen (Orbicon A/S, DK), Katrine Smith (Danish EPA, DK), Hasse Milter (Region Zealand, DK), Ulrich Gosewinkel, Tue Kjærgaard Nielsen, Anders Johansen (Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000 Roskilde, DK) ? Novel and advanced chemical interpretation methods documenting Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA) of pesticides Trine Jepsen (Orbicon, DK), Hasse Milter (Region Zealand, DK), Mads Georg Møller, Nina Tuxen, Niels Døssing, Lars Christian Larsen, Janni Thomsen (Orbicon, DK) Meeting Room 20 SpS 1C.30S US EPA 2: Evolution of optimization programs and key trends in cleanup and R&D Organizers: Carlos S. Pachon and Stephen A. Dyment (United States Environmental Protection Agency) The evolution of the Superfund program has progressed from an early focus on pump & treat systems and long term monitoring networks, to a more comprehensive and holistic site evaluation conducted at any phase throughout the cleanup process. The ultimate goal being design, construction, and operation of the most efficient, effective, and protective remedies EPA and stakeholders can provide. This session will explore the evolution of EPAs optimization programs and highlight how thinking has evolved from presumptive application of large scale aggressive remediation technologies to a focus on high resolution site characterization and conceptual site model development in support of adaptive management for application of multiple targeted treatment technologies. The session will then open for a discussion on key trends in cleanup, research and development efforts, and needs faced by the cleanup community as a whole. 37  Meeting Room 18 SpS 3.2S Get inspired – help shape the European strategic research agenda on soil, land use and land management Organizers: Margot de Cleen (Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, NL), Sandra Boekhold (Soil Protection Technical Committee, NL), and INSPIRATION project team members Moderator: Paul Nathanail (University of Nottingham, UK) This session will illustrate how the soil-water-sediment system is interconnected, influenced by land use and land management (the connectivity concept) and thus impacts solutions of great societal challenges such as climate change adaptation, food and drinking water security, resource efficiency, energy transition and the circular economy. Information about the H2020- project INSPIRATION will be shared; this project is a coordination and support action aiming at developing a Strategic Research Agenda (SRA) for Europe on Integrated Spatial Planning, land use and soil management. Information will be exchanged on the main societal challenges in different regions of Europe related to the sustainable use and management of land’s soil-water-sediment system. An outline will be given on shared national and European research priorities and potential funders and stakeholders (willing to invest). An aim is also to contribute to (or enable) the formation or strengthening of transnational networks on similar themes and to anticipate on possible cooperation within consortia for Horizon 2020. Program: ? Connectivity of the complex soil-water-sediment system in relation to land use and land management Key note presentation – speaker to be confirmed ? Introduction on INSPIRATION Detlef Grimski, project coordinator (Federal Environmental Agency, DE) ? Discussion in groups on societal issues related to land use, land management and the use of the soil-water-sediment system that are high on national and regional (research) agendas ? Plenary reporting back ? Discussion in groups on priority research subjects and potential stakeholders and funders for these main themes ? Plenary reporting back ? Closing remarks 38  Explanation: Hall number Regular thematic session (ThS) or Special session (SpS) lecture title, presenter, co-authors, (institution, country) Meeting Room 19 SpS 1C.31S US EPA session 3: Optimizing remedies, greener cleanups and trends in site cleanup Organizers: Carlos S. Pachon and Stephen A. Dyment (United States Environmental Protection Agency) As the EPA Superfund Cleanup program moves forward with the cleanup of the most contaminated sites in the U.S., the concept of remedy optimization has become a central tenet to maximize the return on cleanup investments. This session will be more in-depth and technical than session 1C.30S, focusing on trends in the use of various treatment technologies in the context of lessons learned from optimization reviews. The session will also cover green remediation perspectives, including developments and findings from the application of green remediation in the U.S. Superfund and other cleanup programs and insights on the recently released American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Guide for Greener Cleanups. The session will include a brief discussion of how EPA integrates social and economic elements of sustainability in Superfund cleanups. Auditorium 10 ThS 1B.10 Risk management and practice ? State of play: is risk assessment a help or hindrance in sustainable decision making for contaminated sites across the globe? Katy Baker (ARCADIS EC Harris, GB), Debanjan Bandyopadhyay (SENES Consultants India Pvt. Ltd., ARCADIS, IN), Aurelie Blusseau (ARCADIS ESG, FR), Pawel Goldsztejn (ARCADIS Sp. z o.o., PL), Lien Heynderickx (ARCADIS Belgium nv, BE), Patricia Iezzi (ARCADIS Logos, BR), Francesco Ioppolo (ARCADIS Italia, IT), Joe Jiao (ARCADIS EC Harris, CN), Ragna Jansen (ARCADIS Netherlands, NL), Christian Niederer (BMG Engineering AG, CH), Harriet Phillips (SENES Consultants, ARCADIS, CA), Greet Schrauwen (ARCADIS Deutschland GmbH, DE), Tamar Schlekat (ARCADIS U.S., Inc, US) ? Promoting defensible risk-based decisions and sustainability in contaminated land management in Finland Jussi Reinikainen (Finnish Environment Institute, SYKE, FI) ? An approach to risk assessment and management of contaminated land in P.R. of China Steve Leroi, Adrien Kahn (SITA Remediation, BE) ? Direct toxicity testing for contaminated land management Katalin Gruiz (Budapest University of Technology and Economics, HU) ? Groundwaters use in agriculture and chemical contamination: need for a risk assessment framework in Italy Mario Carere, Laura Achene, Luca Lucentini, Eleonora Beccaloni (National Institute of Health, IT) Auditorium 11 ThS 1C.25 Phytoremediation ? Citric acid enhanced plant growth, antioxidant defense system, and phytoextraction of chromium by Brassica napus L. Shafaqat Ali, Saima Aslam Bharwana, Muhammad Rizwan, Sehar Afshan, Mujahid Farid (Government College University Faisalabad, PK), Nabeel Khan Niazi, Irshad Bibi (Southern Cross University/University of Agriculture Faisalabad, PK) ? Potential of alfalfa for the treatment of hydrocarbons and heavy metals co-contaminated soils: effect of bioaugmentation-assisted phytoremediation David Huguenot, Ana Carolina Agnello, Eric Van Hullebusch (Université Paris Est Marne la Vallée, FR), Giovanni Esposito (University of Cassino, IT) Friday 12 June 09:00-10:30 39  ? Fate and behavior of TCE in willow trees during phytoremediat