NAEM Survey Results – EMIS in use in 2007

NAEM - the Premier Association for EHS Management2007 EHS MIS WORKSHOP2007 EHS MIS WORKSHOPEHS MIS SURVEY RESULTSSurvey OverviewSurvey Overview? Online Survey Sent to NAEM Membership Plus? 113 respondents 96 respondents with meaningful? 113 respondents – 96 respondents with meaningful data ? Questions in the following CategoriesQ g g? Section I - Organizational Information? Section IIA – Current EHS Systemsi h l f? Section IIB – Technology Infrastructure? Section III – Quantifying Value? Section IV – Current Issues? Section IV Current IssuesOrganizational InformationRespondent Company ProfileRespondent Company Profile2001 2005 2007Number of Respondents apx 80 apx 96with 1,000 - 50,000 employees 74% 65%with over 10,000 employees 57% 60%with revenue $1B-$10B 44% 44% 43%with revenue > $10B 21% 21% 29%multinational 79% 80%with integrated EHS department(vs separate E H S) 54% 69% 67%(vs. separate E, H, S) 54% 69% 67%Respondent Company ProfileRespondent Company Profile2001 2005 2007with1-9 sites 31% 14%with 10 99 sites 47% 57%with 10-99 sites 47% 57%with 100+ sites 22% 29%Business Sector Count PercentManufacturing - Other non-electronic 43 45%gEnergy 9 9%All other choices 44 46%Technology InfrastructureRelative Age of EHS MIS gApplications1 year old or less1 to 2 years old2 to 5 years old20072005*5 years old or more0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%Technology InfrastructureTechnology InfrastructureA shift to the web browser, away from Access?Access less widely used as primary interface and primary database? Interface 2005 31% 2007 14%? Primary db 2005 40% 2007 29%? Primary db 2005 40% 2007 29%?User interface shifts to the web browser? Interface 2005 27% 2007 49%Technology InfrastructureTechnology Infrastructure?Externally hosted applications more acceptedDeployment Methods 2005 2007I t t (i t l h ti i t l ) 89% 64%Intranet (internal hosting, internal users) 89% 64%ASP (external hosting) 11% 24%E t t (i t l h ti t l ) 11% 14%Extranet (internal hosting, external users) 11% 14%ERP IntegrationERP Integration?Most respondents do not plan to integrate with other company systems, especially accountingIntegration Achieved, or Planned, with Other Systems2005 20072005 2007Accounting/Financial 33% 30%ERP (i.e. SAP, PeopleSoft, etc.) 48% 46%Human Resources 52% 42%Inventory Control 44% 41%Maintenance 44% 39%Manufacturing 38% 43%Purchasing 46% 43%Risk Management 37% 39%System Integration y gComparison2001 2005 2007Accounting/Financial Enterprise Resource Planning (i.e. 2001 2005 2007SAP, PeopleSoft, etc.) Human Resources I t C t lInventory Control Maintenance Manufacturing Purchasing 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%Risk Management Current EHS SystemsMost Requested qInformationWhat information are EHS Managers asked for?Incident statistics 71Notice-of-violation statistics 48Compliance targets/objectives 45Compliance targets/objectives 45Sustainability Metrics for Environmental Reporting 42EHS t i f ti 29EHS cost information 29Regulatory Updates 28Other statistics (please specify) 13(p p y)EHS MIS SophisticationEHS MIS Sophistication2025?On a scale of 0 to 10, rate the level of overall EHSMIS process sophisticationIn 2005, the median response was slightly lower (the highlighted cluster101520 slightly lower (the highlighted cluster ranged from 5-8 instead of 6-8)0550+ sites <50 sitesFrequency of ImplementationFrequency of Implementation? Top 15 Most Implemented Applications (All levels)Count EffectivenessEMS or ISO 14001 Management System 46 6.9Injury & Illness Incident Statistics 64 6.8Emergency Management & Preparedness 38 6.7EHS Auditing 58 6.7NOV Tracking 49 6.4Non-Conformance Statistics 40 6.4Wastewater/Stormwater Management 36 6.3gEHS Project Management 27 6.3Air Emissions Management 46 6.2MSDS Creation - Outbound for Customers 69 6.2EHSMIS ApplicationsppImplementation and Effectiveness? Question : ? Please indicate which electronic EHS Information systems you have y yin your organization to support the EHS functions, and at what level.? For the ones that you have, please identify by checking if they are implemented at a specific plant or facility, specific p p p y, pdivision, enterprise wide, or not applicable (N/A). ? Then rank your perception of the relative effectiveness of each system (10 being highest, 1 being lowest).y ( g g , g )Implementation Within the pOrganizationEnterprise Division PlantInjury & Illness Incident 48 8Statistics 48 8Performance Metrics 49 7EHS Documents/ Knowledge Base 43 6EHS Auditing 47 7Training Tracking (EHS) 10 26g g ( )Number of reported implementationsEffectivenessEffectiveness? Top 15 Most Effective Applications (All levels)Count EffectivenessEMS or ISO 14001 Management System 46 6.9Injury & Illness Incident Statistics 64 6 8Injury & Illness Incident Statistics 64 6.8Emergency Management & Preparedness 38 6.7EHS Auditing 58 6.7NOV Tracking 49 6.4N C f S i i 40 6 4Non-Conformance Statistics 40 6.4Wastewater/Stormwater Management 36 6.3EHS Project Management 27 6.3Air Emissions Management 46 6.2MSDS Creation - Outbound for Customers 69 6.2Performance Metrics 61 6.2Incident Management 53 6.1Regulatory Tracking Calendar 49 6.1Regulatory Tracking Calendar 49 6.1EHS Documents/ Knowledge Base 59 6.0Risk Management 33 6.0Quantifying ValueEHSMIS BudgetEHSMIS BudgetEHS MIS BudgetCorporate Facility TotalLess than $10,000 11 38 6$10,000-$50,000 16 8 14$50,000-$100,000 14 8 14$100,000-$500,000 20 0 13$500,000-$1 Million 6 2 9$1-10 Million 7 0 7Over $10 Million 0 0 1EHSMIS Budget EHS MISB dgby Annual SalesBudgetLess than $10,000$10,000-$50,000$50,000-$100,000$100,000-$500,000$500,000-$1 Million$1-10 MillionGrand TotalTotal S lLess than $10 Milli 1 1Sales Million1 1$10-$50 Million 0$50-$250 Million 3 1 1 5Million$250-$500 Million 1 1 2 4$500 Million-$1 Billion 3 2 1 2 8$1-10 Billion 3 8 7 9 3 3 33$10 - $50 Billion 1 3 2 5 2 3 16Over $50Over $50 Billion 2 1 1 1 5Grand Total 11 14 14 20 6 7 72Allocation of Total BudgetAllocation of Total BudgetSoftware Hardware TrainingExternal consultantsInternal consultants0-5% 7 20 17 9 95-10% 10 12 13 8 1010-20% 14 9 18 12 920-40% 14 6 3 16 1240-60% 7 0 1 5 560-80% 8 0 0 7 480-100% 8 0 0 4 2Estimated Typical ypEHSMIS Budget AllocationInternal Software, 35%consultants, 20%External consultants, 28%consultants, 28%This estimation is based onHardware, 8%Training, 9%This estimation is based on reported budget allocation (i.e.,itis not weighted by size of budget)Funding Development: g pWhen and What?Audit IncidentProcess/ Change Mgt. Resources TrainingDo not plan to 20 21 29 24 20develop 20 21 29 24 20Next 12 months 17 21 4 13 1212-24 months 10 11 16 9 22More than 24 12 11 12 13 9months 12 11 12 13 9Current IssuesCurrent IssuesCurrent IssuesQ ti Wh t d t b i t bQuestion:What needs are not being met by your EHS MIS?E t l t t / li 37External contractor/supplier access 37Document Management 35C li P it ti / i ti 35Compliance Permit reporting/printing 35EMS Requirements 34EHS roll ups and reporting 34EHS roll-ups and reporting 34Training 33Compliance/Incident Tracking 22Compliance/Incident Tracking 22Other (please specify) 6Summary of FindingsSummary of Findings?Move from Access-based systems to web-based systemsbased systems?Less integration with enterprise systems?L EHS MIS b d t th 2005?Larger EHS MIS budgets than 2005?Slight shift towards maturing systems & EHS MIS hi ti tiEHS MIS process sophistication?External hosting of systems increasingQuestions/CommentsQuestions/Comments