Prism Research Glass, Inc.

250ml Storage Bottle

SHARE

This standard is issued under the fixed designation D1275; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A superscript epsilon (ε) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.

Most popular related searches

This standard has been adopted for use by government agencies to replace Method 5328-2 of Federal Test Method No. 79lb. This standard was adopted as an ASTM-IP Standard.

This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the U.S. Department of Defense.

INTRODUCTION

Prior to 2006, this test method existed as a singular method in which the main aging parameters of the test specimen were 19 h at 140°C. In 2006, it was determined that those parameters were inadequate (not sensitive enough to detect all levels of corrosive sulfur) and Method B was instituted in which the main aging parameters were 48 h at 150°C.  The old parameters were kept as Method A to avoid any confusion. The current edition of this test method for the copper corrosion procedure reverts back to a singular method in which the main aging parameters are the same as the previous Method B (2006-2014). Results from the current test method cannot be compared or correlated to the method prior to 2006 and only to Method B from 2006 to 2014.

1. Scope

1.1 This test method describes the detection of corrosive sulfur compounds (both inorganic and organic) in electrical insulating liquids.

1.2 New and in-service insulating liquids may contain elemental sulfur or sulfur compounds, or both, that cause corrosion under certain conditions of use. This test method is designed to detect the presence of, or the propensity to form, free (elemental) sulfur and corrosive sulfur compounds by subjecting copper or silver to contact with an insulating liquid under prescribed conditions.

1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. Inch-pound units are included for informational purposes.

1.4 This standard does not purport to address the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

2. Referenced Documents

2.1 ASTM Standards:2
D130 Test Method for Corrosiveness to Copper from Petroleum Products by Copper Strip Test
D923 Practices for sampling Electrical Insulating Liquids
E11 Specification for Woven Wire Test Sieve Cloth and Test Sieves

2.2 Other Document:
ANSI B74.10 rading of Abrasive Microgrits3
DIN 51 353 Testing of INsulating Oils; detection of corrosive sulfur, silver strip test4

3. Significance and Use

3.1 In most of their uses, insulating liquids are continually in contact with metals that are subject to corrosion. The presence of elemental sulfur or corrosive sulfur compounds will result in deterioration of these metals and cause conductive or high resistive films to form. The extent of deterioration is dependent upon the quantity and type of corrosive agent and time and temperature factors. Detection of these undesirable impurities, even though not in terms of quantitative values, in a means for recognizing the hazard involved.

3.2 Two methods are provided, one for copper corrosion and one for silver corrosion. Copper is slightly less sensitive to sulfur corrosion than silver but the results are easier to interpret and less prone to error. The silver corrosion procedure is provided especially for those users who have applications where the insulating liquid is in contact with a silver surface.

4. Apparatus

4.1 Bath – A hot-air oven or liquid bath provided with suitable means of heating to, and controlling at 140 or 150 ± 2°C. A circulating hot-air oven is preferred.

4.2 Bottles5 – Heavy-walled, 250-mL, bottles of chemically resistant glass constructed with necks to receive a polytetra-fluoroethylene (PTFE) threaded plug equipped with a fluoro-elastomer O-Ring. Bottles of such capacity and design are required in order to allow sufficient space for expansion of the insulating liquid and to eliminate intrusion from atmospheric gases. Flat bottomed bottles are preferred.

4.3 Copper Foil, 99.9+ % pure, 0.127 to 0.254 mm (0.005 to 0.010 in.) in thickness.

4.4 Silver Foil, 99,9+ % pure, 0.5 mm thick.

4.5 Polishing Material, consisting of 240-grit silicon carbide paper or cloth (refer to Specification E11), and also 230-mesh silicon carbide grains and pharmaceutical absorbent cotton.

Note 1 – It should be noted that 240-grit silicon carbide paper and 230-mesh silicon carbide grains have particle sizes of about the same size (63 μm). In the United States, abrasive papers are classified in accordance with ANSI B74.10. Abrasive powders are classified by ASTM mesh size.

5. Reagents

5.1 Acetone, ACS reagent grade.

5.2 Hydrochloric Acid – ACS reagent grade, 36.5 to 38.0 % assay.

5.3 Nitrogen Gas – Commercial cylinders of nitrogen gas are satisfactory for this purpose.

5.4 Suitable Solvent – technical grade acetone, heptane, hexane and pentane.

5.5 Water, distilled.

6. Summary of Test Methods

6.1 Copper Corrosion – 220 mL of insulating liquid is aged in a sealed heavy-walled bottle for 48 h at 150°C in the presence of a copper strip.

6.2 Silver Corrosion – 220 mL of insulating liquid is aged in a sealed heavy-walled bottle for 48 h at 150°C in the presence of a silver strip.

7. Preparation of Apparatus

7.1 Chemically clean bottles and PTFE screw plugs with solvents to remove insulating liquid residue, then wash the bottles with a suitable solvent such as heptane or hexane, or us a phosphate-type cleaning powder or liquid. Rinse with tap water, then with distilled water, and dry in an oven. Replace the fluoro-elastomer O-Ring before each test to avoid cross contamination.

7.2 Polish a larger piece of copper or silver foil from which, after the final polishing, several strips of the proper size may be cut. Remove blemishes from both surfaces of the copper or silver foils with the 240-grit silicon carbide paper. Cut a strip(s) of copper or silver foil 6 by 25 mm (1/4 by 1 in.). Strips may be stored in sulfur-free acetone at this point for future use. Do the final polishing of the strip by removing it from the acetone, holding it in the fingers protected with ashless filter paper or nitrile gloves, and rubbing with 230-mesh silicon carbide grains picked up from a glass plate with a pad of absorbent cotton moistened with a drop of acetone. Wipe the strip with fresh pads of cotton and subsequently handle only with stainless steel forceps (do not touch with fingers). Rub in the direction of the long axis of the strip. Clean all metal dust and abrasive from the strip, using successive clean cotton pads until a fresh pad remains unsoiled. Bend the clean strip in a V-shape at approximately at 60° angle and wash successively in acetone, distilled water, and acetone. Dry in an oven for 3 to 5 min at 80 to 100°C and immediately immerse the copper or silver strip in the prepared test specimen of insulating liquid (Note 2). Do not use compressed air or an inert gas to dry the metal strip.

Note 2 – This method of cleaning has been adapted from Test Method D130.

8. Copper Corrosion Procedure

8.1 Retrieve a sample for testing in accordance with Practices D923. Use the insulating liquid to be tested as received. Do no filter the insulating liquid.

8.2 Promptly place the prepared copper strip in a clean 250-mL bottle to which has been added 220 mL of the insulating liquid to be tested. Place the bent copper strip standing on its long edge so that no flat surface lies along the glass bottom of the vessel. Bubble nitrogen through the insulating liquid in the bottle by means of a 1.5 mm inner diameter (approximately 1/16 in. inner diameter) glass or stainless steel tube connected to the reduction or needle valve of the cylinder (connections must be sulfur-free) for 5 min at a rate of 0.5 /min. Quickly screw in the PTFE plug equipped with flouro-elastomer O-Ring (Note 3).

8.3 Place the bottle with the test specimen in the oven at 150°C, partially unscrew the PTFE plug to release the pressure and then screw it back down. REmove the bottle after heating for 48 h ± 20 min at 150 ± 2°C. Allow to cool. Carefully take the copper strip from the bottle and wash with acetone or other suitable solvent to remove all of the insulating liquid and let air dry. Do not use pressurized air to dry the copper strip.

8.4 To inspect, hold the test strip in such a manner so that light reflected from it at an angle of approximately 45° will be observed. Interpret and report the results as defined in Sections 9 and 10. If there is difficulty in determining whether the copper strip is considered to be noncorrosive or corrosive, refer to 8.5 and 8.5.1.

8.5 If a specimen is borderline or unclear (between noncorrosive and corrosive), cut the strip in half along the bent portion of the copper strip. Retain one half and treat the other half as described in 8.5.1.

8.5.1 Submerge the half of the copper strip completely in a 1:1 solution of HCl and distilled water at room temperature and wait 20 ± 2 min while gently swirling on occasion. If the deposit in question is still present and did not fade or discolor, then interpret and report the result as corrosive in Sections 9 and 10. If the deposit has been removed or has turned tan/beige, then corrosive sulfur is not present and the result is to be reported as noncorrosive. The tarnish level is then determined on the untreated portion of the copper strip. Report the tarnish level of the untreated portion of the copper strip as listed in 9.1 disregarding the color on the strip that made it unclear in the initial inspection of the strip.

Note 3 – The corrosive effects of the unstable sulfur compounds present in the insulating liquid are reduced when aged under strong oxidizing conditions such as when oxygen is present. It is imperative to keep the bottle well sealed after nitrogen bubbling. If the insulating liquid visibly darkens during testing then most likely oxygen has entered the test bottle and oxidized the insulating liquid. In the cases, the test procedure has become compromised and must be repeated.