- Home
- Companies
- AEL Environment
- Services
- Environment Risk Assessment Services
Environment Risk Assessment Services
Risk Assessment Manages Your Site’s Unique Challenges. In the environmental assessment process, a property owner retains a qualified person such as an experienced engineer or geoscientist to perform testing as part of the Phase II ESA. The Phase II ESA may reveal contaminants at concentrations greater than generic standards set out in Ontario Regulation 153/04. When these types of impacts are noted, the QP can advise remediation (such as the traditional dig-and-dump method) or can perform a risk assessment which develops property-specific standards and supports the submission of a Record of Site Condition. Risk management (RM) measures may also be required to protect property users and surrounding users and the environment from contaminants remaining on the property.
An RA can ensure adequate protection to the general public and construction workers without unnecessarily increasing the cost of development or taking up valuable landfill resources or trucking contaminated materials through the local area. The RA process is more prescriptive under the new EPA provisions and RSC Regulations, thus ensuring a more rigorous process and significantly reducing the risk exposure to the property owner.
AEL environment provides expert risk assessment services to clients with a variety of environmental needs and opportunities. Our senior risk assessors have more than 20 years of experience in evaluating risk on behalf of clients and liaising with the MOE to reach appropriate solutions quickly and at a low cost.
Risk assessment calculates the probability that a hazard (like environmental contamination in the soil or groundwater) will cause harm to humans, plants, wildlife and the natural environment under specific conditions of exposure to a contaminant. The purpose of a risk assessment is to develop property-specific standards that will protect the uses that are being proposed for the property, so it is important to consider the client’s end use goals when choosing risk assessment options.
The RA Process
The QP initially prepares information on the property and how people would be exposed to contaminants. Human health risk assessment (HHRA) is the evaluation of the risk of adverse health effects to humans caused by exposure to a contaminant at a given property. Ecological risk assessment (ERA) evaluates the risk that adverse ecological effects may occur as a result of exposure to contaminant(s). Many contaminants may be present together in different media such as food, air, water, soil and dust. These contaminants reach receptors through multiple exposure pathways such as ingestion, dermal contact in inhalation.
This information is submitted and reviewed by the Ministry of Environment (MOE) using a Pre-Submission Form (PSF). This review allows the ministry to comment on the scope and approach of the RA. This helps the property owner to decide the best way to proceed with completing the RA and if any additional investigations are required prior to undertaking the RA. A PSF can save the owner time and money!
An owner can submit a Modified Generic Risk Assessment (MGRA) or Tier 2 RA. The MOE has developed an “Approved Model” which allows users to modify some of the generic assumptions used in creating the standards. The MOE’s review time for a MGRA is approximately eight weeks. This approach is intended to be timelier and more cost effective. The “Appoved Model can result in less stringent standards while maintaining the same target level of protection as a generic standard.
The Approved Model can be used in either a MGRA (Tier 2 RA) or a full (Tier 3) RA. For an RA to be considered an MGRA, the RA must have used only the Approved Model and used only RM measures as stipulated in the model. For a full Tier 3 RA, the approval times range from 4 months to 18 months (excluding external delays). There is also a Streamlined Tier 3 RA. This is a hybrid approach which incorporates many aspects of the Modified Generic RA but deviates from the MGRA in areas such as exposure limits and the derivation of property-specific standards other than those produced by the Approved Model. The use of this approach is acceptable by the MOE but its application should be reviewed with the MOE’s Streamlined Risk Assessment Coordinator prior to submission. This approach has a timeline typically longer than a MGRA but much shorter than a full Tier 3 RA.
The MOE will review the completed RA and will decide to accept or reject the risk assessment. If the risk assessment is not accepted, the property owner can revised the risk assessment and resubmit it or choose to remediate the site to generic standards.
RA Risk Management Measures
Risk assessment can often lead to recommendations to utilize risk management to provide protection to human health and the environment. In this situation, risk management measures must be maintained to achieve the same target level of risk as the site conditions standards. Risk management is a process to control or reduce the level of risk estimated by the risk assessment. Risk management integrates the results from the other components of risk assessment with information about technical resources, socio-economic factors and control options in order to reach decisions about the best way to manage a property.
If risk management measures are required, the ministry may issue a certificate of property use (CPU) to ensure that over time the property owner maintains the measures. Local stakeholders may be consulted when considering risk management measures. An MOE order may also be required so that the CPU is registered on the title to the property.
In summary, the risk assessment process can be complex, but is also very worthwhile when used appropriately. If you have questions about whether an RA is right for your property, contact AEL Environment, an environmental consulting firm in Ontario, Canada.
